From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>, Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
UlrichWeigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
pedro@palves.net
Cc: luis.machado@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix reverse stepping multiple contiguous PC ranges over the line table.
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:44:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ab1e3ff-eede-5573-f58f-63ff8b1e23bb@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95df539fed378baea3dd679bb10d33c57260f318.camel@us.ibm.com>
On 6/22/23 12:52, Carl Love wrote:
>
> Simon:
>
> On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 13:11 -0400, Simon Marchi wrote:
>>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>>> @@ -4794,6 +4794,8 @@ proc quote_for_host { args } {
>>> # debug information
>>> # - text_segment=addr: Tell the linker to place the text
>>> segment at ADDR.
>>> # - build-id: Ensure the final binary includes a build-id.
>>> +# - no-column-info: Disable generation of column table
>>> information.
>>> +# - column-info: Enable generation of column table information.
>>> #
>>> # And here are some of the not too obscure options understood by
>>> DejaGnu that
>>> # influence the compilation:
>>> @@ -5003,6 +5005,34 @@ proc gdb_compile {source dest type options}
>>> {
>>> } else {
>>> error "Don't know how to handle text_segment
>>> option."
>>> }
>>> + } elseif { $opt == "column-info" } {
>>> + if {[test_compiler_info {gcc-*}]} {
>>> + if {[test_compiler_info {gcc-[1-6]-*}]} {
>>> + error "gdb_compile option no-column-info not
>>> supported."
>>
>> I think this path should return the equivalent of "failed to
>> compile",
>> instead of throwing an error. Control will go back to the test,
>> which
>> will generally skip the portion of the test that requires that
>> binary.
>
> Not entirely sure how to accomplish what you are looking for.
>
> I change:
> error "gdb_compile option no-column-info not supported."
> to
> set result "option no-column-info not supported."
> clone_output "gdb compile failed, $result"
> return 1
>
> When I force the if {[test_compiler_info...]} tp be true to test this,
> I get:
>
> get_compiler_info: gcc-12-2-1
> gdb compile failed, option no-column-info not supported.
> UNTESTED: gdb.reverse/func-map-to-same-line.exp:
> with_column_info=yes: failed t\
> o prepare
> testcase /home/carll/GDB/build-reverse-multiple-
> contiguous/gdb/testsuite/../../\
> ../binutils-gdb-reverse-multiple-
> contiguous/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/func-map-\
> to-same-line.exp completed in 0 seconds
>
> === gdb Summary ===
>
> # of untested testcases 1
>
> The test case doesn't have any part of the test that doesn't require
> compiling so it is not clear if that would work with this fix. Anyway,
> wanted to run that by you to see if this is an appropriate fix? I am
> really not sure about it. Thanks.
I think that's the expected behavior. The UNTESTED is emitted by
build_executable_from_specs, I think. If the test used gdb_compile, I
think we wouldn't see an UNTESTED. But as far as your addition is
concerned, I think it's fine.
I just thought of a simpler alternative though. Just remove the version
check. If we build with an older gcc, there will simply be a message
that says that the flag is not recognized, and the result should be just
the same. I just hacked it locally and changed the flag name to be
wrong (I don't have a gcc <= 6 on hand to test). It looks like:
Executing on host: gcc -fno-stack-protector -fdiagnostics-color=never -gcolumn-info-foo -c -g -o /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.reverse/func-map-to-same-line/func-map-to-same-line0.o /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/func-map-to-same-line.c (timeout = 300)
builtin_spawn -ignore SIGHUP gcc -fno-stack-protector -fdiagnostics-color=never -gcolumn-info-foo -c -g -o /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.reverse/func-map-to-same-line/func-map-to-same-line0.o /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/func-map-to-same-line.c
gcc: error: unrecognized debug output level 'column-info-foo'
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
gcc: error: unrecognized debug output level 'column-info-foo'
gdb compile failed, gcc: error: unrecognized debug output level 'column-info-foo'
UNTESTED: gdb.reverse/func-map-to-same-line.exp: with_column_info=yes: failed to prepare
I then thought about the "no-column-info" case. Currently, you error
out for gccs <= 6. However, shouldn't we just compile without any
special flag in that case, since there just wasn't any support for
column-info back then?
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-27 20:59 [PATCH] " Carl Love
2023-05-02 14:15 ` Bruno Larsen
2023-05-02 15:40 ` Carl Love
2023-05-02 15:42 ` Bruno Larsen
2023-05-11 15:11 ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-03 9:53 ` Bruno Larsen
2023-05-04 2:55 ` Carl Love
2023-05-04 9:24 ` Bruno Larsen
2023-05-04 14:52 ` Carl Love
2023-05-04 2:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Carl Love
2023-05-04 15:59 ` [PATCH v3] " Carl Love
2023-05-05 14:59 ` Luis Machado
2023-05-05 16:10 ` Carl Love
2023-05-10 13:47 ` Bruno Larsen
2023-05-10 17:16 ` Carl Love
2023-05-10 17:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Carl Love
2023-05-11 16:01 ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-11 16:23 ` Bruno Larsen
2023-05-11 17:28 ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-16 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Carl Love
2023-06-19 17:11 ` Simon Marchi
2023-06-22 16:52 ` Carl Love
2023-06-23 17:44 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-06-23 19:41 ` Carl Love
2023-06-23 20:04 ` [PATCH 1/2 ver 2] " Carl Love
2023-07-06 15:07 ` Carl Love
2023-05-16 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/2 v5] " Carl Love
2023-05-25 15:08 ` Carl Love
2023-06-08 16:36 ` Carl Love
2023-06-19 17:58 ` Simon Marchi
2023-06-22 20:38 ` Carl Love
2023-06-22 20:39 ` Carl Love
2023-06-23 17:49 ` Simon Marchi
2023-06-23 20:04 ` Carl Love
2023-06-23 20:04 ` [PATCH 2/2 v6] " Carl Love
2023-05-16 22:54 ` [PATCH v4] " Carl Love
2023-05-11 7:52 ` [PATCH v3] " Bruno Larsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ab1e3ff-eede-5573-f58f-63ff8b1e23bb@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=blarsen@redhat.com \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=pedro@palves.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).