public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
@ 2022-04-26  0:23 John Baldwin
  2022-04-26 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Baldwin @ 2022-04-26  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Convert bsd_kvm_corefile and the local filename in bsd_kvm_open to
std::string rather than simple char * pointers freed by xfree.
---
 gdb/bsd-kvm.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/bsd-kvm.c b/gdb/bsd-kvm.c
index 45c7f116472..87b79606b4f 100644
--- a/gdb/bsd-kvm.c
+++ b/gdb/bsd-kvm.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include "defs.h"
 #include "cli/cli-cmds.h"
 #include "command.h"
+#include "filenames.h"
 #include "frame.h"
 #include "regcache.h"
 #include "target.h"
@@ -30,6 +31,7 @@
 #include "inferior.h"          /* for get_exec_file */
 #include "gdbthread.h"
 #include "gdbsupport/pathstuff.h"
+#include "gdbsupport/gdb_tilde_expand.h"
 
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <kvm.h>
@@ -47,7 +49,7 @@
 #include "bsd-kvm.h"
 
 /* Kernel memory device file.  */
-static const char *bsd_kvm_corefile;
+static std::string bsd_kvm_corefile;
 
 /* Kernel memory interface descriptor.  */
 static kvm_t *core_kd;
@@ -109,24 +111,19 @@ bsd_kvm_target_open (const char *arg, int from_tty)
   char errbuf[_POSIX2_LINE_MAX];
   const char *execfile = NULL;
   kvm_t *temp_kd;
-  char *filename = NULL;
+  std::string filename;
 
   target_preopen (from_tty);
 
   if (arg)
     {
-      filename = tilde_expand (arg);
-      if (filename[0] != '/')
-	{
-	  gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> temp (gdb_abspath (filename));
-
-	  xfree (filename);
-	  filename = temp.release ();
-	}
+      filename = gdb_tilde_expand (arg);
+      if (!IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (filename))
+	filename = gdb_abspath (filename.c_str ());
     }
 
   execfile = get_exec_file (0);
-  temp_kd = kvm_openfiles (execfile, filename, NULL,
+  temp_kd = kvm_openfiles (execfile, filename.c_str (), NULL,
 			   write_files ? O_RDWR : O_RDONLY, errbuf);
   if (temp_kd == NULL)
     error (("%s"), errbuf);
@@ -155,6 +152,7 @@ bsd_kvm_target::close ()
       core_kd = NULL;
     }
 
+  bsd_kvm_corefile.clear ();
   switch_to_no_thread ();
   exit_inferior_silent (current_inferior ());
 }
@@ -203,9 +201,10 @@ bsd_kvm_target::xfer_partial (enum target_object object,
 void
 bsd_kvm_target::files_info ()
 {
-  if (bsd_kvm_corefile && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile, _PATH_MEM) != 0)
+  if (!bsd_kvm_corefile.empty ()
+      && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile.c_str (), _PATH_MEM) != 0)
     gdb_printf (_("\tUsing the kernel crash dump %s.\n"),
-		bsd_kvm_corefile);
+		bsd_kvm_corefile.c_str ());
   else
     gdb_printf (_("\tUsing the currently running kernel.\n"));
 }
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
  2022-04-26  0:23 [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions John Baldwin
@ 2022-04-26 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
  2022-04-26 16:12   ` John Baldwin
  2022-04-26 12:17 ` Simon Marchi
  2022-04-26 18:41 ` Tom Tromey
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2022-04-26 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Baldwin, gdb-patches

On 2022-04-26 01:23, John Baldwin wrote:
> @@ -203,9 +201,10 @@ bsd_kvm_target::xfer_partial (enum target_object object,
>  void
>  bsd_kvm_target::files_info ()
>  {
> -  if (bsd_kvm_corefile && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile, _PATH_MEM) != 0)
> +  if (!bsd_kvm_corefile.empty ()
> +      && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile.c_str (), _PATH_MEM) != 0)

It looks like these two lines could be just "if (bsd_kvm_corefile != _PATH_MEM)" instead ?

>      gdb_printf (_("\tUsing the kernel crash dump %s.\n"),
> -		bsd_kvm_corefile);
> +		bsd_kvm_corefile.c_str ());
>    else
>      gdb_printf (_("\tUsing the currently running kernel.\n"));
>  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
  2022-04-26  0:23 [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions John Baldwin
  2022-04-26 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2022-04-26 12:17 ` Simon Marchi
  2022-04-26 18:41 ` Tom Tromey
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2022-04-26 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Baldwin, gdb-patches


> Convert bsd_kvm_corefile and the local filename in bsd_kvm_open to
> std::string rather than simple char * pointers freed by xfree.

Woops, sorry for missing this.

> @@ -203,9 +201,10 @@ bsd_kvm_target::xfer_partial (enum target_object object,
>  void
>  bsd_kvm_target::files_info ()
>  {
> -  if (bsd_kvm_corefile && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile, _PATH_MEM) != 0)
> +  if (!bsd_kvm_corefile.empty ()
> +      && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile.c_str (), _PATH_MEM) != 0)

The strcmp could probably become

  bsd_kvm_corefile != _PATH_MEM

Otherwise, LGTM.

Simon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
  2022-04-26 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2022-04-26 16:12   ` John Baldwin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Baldwin @ 2022-04-26 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pedro Alves, gdb-patches

On 4/26/22 5:13 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 2022-04-26 01:23, John Baldwin wrote:
>> @@ -203,9 +201,10 @@ bsd_kvm_target::xfer_partial (enum target_object object,
>>   void
>>   bsd_kvm_target::files_info ()
>>   {
>> -  if (bsd_kvm_corefile && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile, _PATH_MEM) != 0)
>> +  if (!bsd_kvm_corefile.empty ()
>> +      && strcmp (bsd_kvm_corefile.c_str (), _PATH_MEM) != 0)
> 
> It looks like these two lines could be just "if (bsd_kvm_corefile != _PATH_MEM)" instead ?

Oh, yes.

>>       gdb_printf (_("\tUsing the kernel crash dump %s.\n"),
>> -		bsd_kvm_corefile);
>> +		bsd_kvm_corefile.c_str ());
>>     else
>>       gdb_printf (_("\tUsing the currently running kernel.\n"));
>>   }


-- 
John Baldwin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
  2022-04-26  0:23 [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions John Baldwin
  2022-04-26 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
  2022-04-26 12:17 ` Simon Marchi
@ 2022-04-26 18:41 ` Tom Tromey
  2022-04-26 18:50   ` John Baldwin
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2022-04-26 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Baldwin; +Cc: gdb-patches

>>>>> "John" == John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:

John>  /* Kernel memory device file.  */
John> -static const char *bsd_kvm_corefile;
John> +static std::string bsd_kvm_corefile;

I never looked at this file before, but it seems like it could be
converted to multi-target without too much trouble.

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
  2022-04-26 18:41 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2022-04-26 18:50   ` John Baldwin
  2022-04-26 19:37     ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Baldwin @ 2022-04-26 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches

On 4/26/22 11:41 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "John" == John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> 
> John>  /* Kernel memory device file.  */
> John> -static const char *bsd_kvm_corefile;
> John> +static std::string bsd_kvm_corefile;
> 
> I never looked at this file before, but it seems like it could be
> converted to multi-target without too much trouble.

So I had looked at this a bit more when Pedro first did the multi-target
series at least in terms of moving more of the globals into the
bsd_kvm_target class.  However, on FreeBSD we don't use bsd-kvm.c
(and haven't in a long time).  I maintain a variant of it downstream
that uses different hooks (and supports multiple kthreads, etc.).   That
one I will likely convert to multi-target at some point.  I may still
fix this one just because I still use bsd-kvm.c as a kind of
reference for tracking API changes in my downstream version.

-- 
John Baldwin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
  2022-04-26 18:50   ` John Baldwin
@ 2022-04-26 19:37     ` Tom Tromey
  2022-04-26 21:47       ` John Baldwin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2022-04-26 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Baldwin; +Cc: Tom Tromey, gdb-patches

John> However, on FreeBSD we don't use bsd-kvm.c
John> (and haven't in a long time).  I maintain a variant of it downstream
John> that uses different hooks (and supports multiple kthreads, etc.).   That
John> one I will likely convert to multi-target at some point.  I may still
John> fix this one just because I still use bsd-kvm.c as a kind of
John> reference for tracking API changes in my downstream version.

It sounds reasonable to me.  It's fine also not to do it.  Also, is
anyone using this code any more?

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions.
  2022-04-26 19:37     ` Tom Tromey
@ 2022-04-26 21:47       ` John Baldwin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Baldwin @ 2022-04-26 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches

On 4/26/22 12:37 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> John> However, on FreeBSD we don't use bsd-kvm.c
> John> (and haven't in a long time).  I maintain a variant of it downstream
> John> that uses different hooks (and supports multiple kthreads, etc.).   That
> John> one I will likely convert to multi-target at some point.  I may still
> John> fix this one just because I still use bsd-kvm.c as a kind of
> John> reference for tracking API changes in my downstream version.
> 
> It sounds reasonable to me.  It's fine also not to do it.  Also, is
> anyone using this code any more?

I have no idea if anyone is using it.  For me it is useful to see what API
changes I need to make downstream.  However, aside from that it is unused
on FreeBSD.  I don't know if anyone is using it on other *BSD's.

(I would eventually like to upstream some of the FreeBSD kernel debugging
bits I maintain, but they aren't really in a suitable shape for upstreaming
currently, though I might at some point try to start extracting at least
some of them for upstreaming.  The replacement for bsd-kvm.c would perhaps
be one of the last to upstream though.)

-- 
John Baldwin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-26 21:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-26  0:23 [PATCH] bsd-kvm: Fix build after recent changes to path handling functions John Baldwin
2022-04-26 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
2022-04-26 16:12   ` John Baldwin
2022-04-26 12:17 ` Simon Marchi
2022-04-26 18:41 ` Tom Tromey
2022-04-26 18:50   ` John Baldwin
2022-04-26 19:37     ` Tom Tromey
2022-04-26 21:47       ` John Baldwin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).