[PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location

[Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>]

Ping

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> Changelog for v4:
>    * rebased on master
>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
> 
> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
> offsets of baseclasses.
> 
> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
> changed to an assert.
> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
> 
> Bruno Larsen (2):
>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
> 
>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>