public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:28:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427122847.233260-1-blarsen@redhat.com> (raw)

Changelog for v4:
  * rebased on master
  * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch

This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
offsets of baseclasses. 

This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
changed to an assert.
Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.

Bruno Larsen (2):
  [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
  [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset

 gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
 gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
 5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c

-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-27 12:28 Bruno Larsen [this message]
2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind Bruno Larsen
2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset Bruno Larsen
2022-05-11 11:12 ` [PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
2022-05-18 11:24   ` [PINGv2] " Bruno Larsen
2022-05-24 11:26     ` [PINGv3] " Bruno Larsen
2022-05-30 11:15       ` [PINGv4] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-06 12:45         ` [PINGv5] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-13 20:03           ` [PINGv6] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-20 13:28             ` [PINGv7] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-27 11:24               ` [PINGv8] " Bruno Larsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220427122847.233260-1-blarsen@redhat.com \
    --to=blarsen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).