Re: RTe: Location Specs (Was: [pushed v5] gdb/manual: Introduce location specs)

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:44:31 +0100
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
> 
> > OK, how about this instead?
> > 
> >   Several @value{GDBN} commands accept arguments that specify a location
> >   or locations of your program's code.  Many times locations are
> >   specified using a source line number, but they can also be specified
> >   by a function name, an address, a label, etc.  The different
> >   forms of specifying a location that @value{GDBN} recognizes are
> >   collectively known as forms of @dfn{location specification}, or
> >   @dfn{location spec}.  This section documents the forms of specifying
> >   locations that @value{GDBN} recognizes.
> 
> Perfect.
> 
> > 
> >>>>>  For a C@t{++} constructor, the @value{NGCC} compiler generates several
> >>>>> -instances of the function body, used in different cases.
> >>>>> +instances of the function body, used in different cases, but their
> >>>>> +source-level names are identical, unless you qualify them.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you mean by "qualify" here?
> >>>
> >>> The "fully-qualified and prototyped function" part.
> >>
> >> That's unrelated to what is being alluded to here.
> > 
> > OK, I will drop the "unless you qualify them" part.
> 
> Sounds good.

Thanks, I made those changes and pushed.