public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>,
	 Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gdb/nat/linux: Fix attaching to process when it has zombie threads
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:15:39 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jbq2vz8.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9675ae26-3e85-4acd-8bbb-8de829818cc8@palves.net> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:59:37 +0100")

Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> writes:

> On 2024-04-20 06:56, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> When GDB attaches to a multi-threaded process, it calls
>> linux_proc_attach_tgid_threads () to go through all threads found in
>> /proc/PID/task/ and call attach_proc_task_lwp_callback () on each of
>> them.  If it does that twice without the callback reporting that a new
>> thread was found, then it considers that all inferior threads have been
>> found and returns.
>> 
>> The problem is that the callback considers any thread that it hasn't
>> attached to yet as new.  This causes problems if the process has one or
>> more zombie threads, because GDB can't attach to it and the loop will
>> always "find" a new thread (the zombie one), and get stuck in an
>> infinite loop.
>> 
>> This is easy to trigger (at least on aarch64-linux and powerpc64le-linux)
>> with the gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp testcase, because
>> its test program constantly creates and finishes joinable threads so the
>> chance of having zombie threads is high.
>> 
>> This problem causes the following failures:
>> 
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: attach (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: no new threads (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: set breakpoint
>> always-inserted on (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: break break_fn (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: break at break_fn: 1
>> (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: break at break_fn: 2
>> (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: break at break_fn: 3
>> (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: reset timer in the
>> inferior (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: print seconds_left
>> (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: detach (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: set breakpoint
>> always-inserted off (timeout)
>> FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 8: delete all breakpoints,
>> watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints in delete_breakpoints (timeout)
>> ERROR: breakpoints not deleted
>> 
>> The iteration number is random, and all tests in the subsequent iterations
>> fail too, because GDB is stuck in the attach command at the beginning of
>> the iteration.
>> 
>> The solution is to make linux_proc_attach_tgid_threads () remember when it
>> has already processed a given LWP and skip it in the subsequent iterations.
>> 
>> PR testsuite/31312
>> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31312
>> 
>> Reviewed-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
>
> Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>

Thank you!

> BTW, after seeing the other patches after patch #1, I do agree with giving names
> to the stat fields.

Great. You did bring up interesting points about them though, so it was
an interesting exercise.

-- 
Thiago

      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-20  5:56 [PATCH v2 0/3] " Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-20  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] gdb/nat: Use procfs(5) indexes in linux_common_core_of_thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-22 19:39   ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-24 23:09     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-20  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] gdb/nat: Factor linux_proc_get_stat_field out of linux_common_core_of_thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-20  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] gdb/nat/linux: Fix attaching to process when it has zombie threads Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-22 19:59   ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-24 23:15     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874jbq2vz8.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).