From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>,
Ivan Tetyushkin <ivan.tetyushkin@syntacore.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] [gdb/testsuite] fix test gdb.base/print-file-var.exp for remote execution
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 13:32:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cz9yc2kz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a15ed31b-6199-8811-4396-58fd63bb0ba4@suse.de>
Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> On 10/25/22 18:29, Ivan Tetyushkin wrote:
>> ---
>> gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
>> index 9abe87d7758..73137630fed 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ proc test {hidden dlopen version_id_main lang} {
>> set libobj1 [standard_output_file ${lib1}$suffix.so]
>> set libobj2 [standard_output_file ${lib2}$suffix.so]
>>
>> + set runtimelibobj2 [get_runtime_file $libobj2]
>> +
>> set lib_opts { debug $lang }
>> lappend lib_opts "additional_flags=-DHIDDEN=$hidden"
>>
>> @@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ proc test {hidden dlopen version_id_main lang} {
>> set link_opts [list debug shlib=${libobj1}]
>>
>> if {$dlopen} {
>> - lappend main_opts "additional_flags=-DSHLIB_NAME=\"$libobj2\""
>> + lappend main_opts "additional_flags=-DSHLIB_NAME=\"$runtimelibobj2\""
>> lappend link_opts "shlib_load"
>> } else {
>> lappend link_opts "shlib=${libobj2}"
>
> I get this test-case passing by avoiding to use an absolute file name:
> ...
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
> b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-
> var.exp
> index 9abe87d7758..338840cb05e 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ proc test {hidden dlopen version_id_main lang} {
> set link_opts [list debug shlib=${libobj1}]
>
> if {$dlopen} {
> - lappend main_opts "additional_flags=-DSHLIB_NAME=\"$libobj2\""
> + lappend main_opts "additional_flags=-DSHLIB_NAME=\"[file tail
> $libobj2]\""
> lappend link_opts "shlib_load"
> } else {
> lappend link_opts "shlib=${libobj2}"
> ...
> which means that the file is found relative to $ORIGIN, as is the case
> for $dlopen == 0.
>
> I'm not entirely happy with this fix, because what we'd rather want is
> to use the name as returned by remote_download, but that's done in
> gdb_load_shlib later on (which also handles shlib_target_file, so
> actually, the name as returned by this proc is the one we really want),
> so it's not available yet at the time we do the compilation.
>
> I've thought about allowing gdb_load_shlib to be called without gdb
> instance, and for cases where there's no instance, registering the
> solib-search-path setting to be done at gdb start. This will allow us
> to move the gdb_load_shlib calls to before the compilation, such that we
> can use the result to set -DSHLIB_NAME. But I think it's a solution
> bound to cause confusion because things happen under the hood.
>
> Alternatively, we can try to not pass in the name into compilation
> (working around only some of the problems related to remote host
> testing, see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16947), but
> that also has its limitations: we need to be able to patch target memory
> or the ability to use argv.
>
> Perhaps splitting up the functionality in gdb_load_shlib makes the most
> sense. By default, it'll do the same as before, but by calling it
> twice, once with -only-download, and once with -no-download can we get
> the solib name before starting gdb.
>
> I've given this a try in patch attached below.
I also prefer the approach that Tom has suggested here. I gave the
patch a go and it fixed the problems in print_file-var.exp for me using
a local/remote type setup.
>
> Ivan, could you check if the patch fixes the gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
> test-case for you?
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
> From b072645433f83d62a4b7cf857d3d50f0dd7e0c75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 11:26:23 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/print-file-var.exp for
> remote target
>
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp | 6 ++-
> gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 48 +++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
> index 9abe87d7758..abdbbbfdce4 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
> @@ -59,8 +59,10 @@ proc test {hidden dlopen version_id_main lang} {
> set main_opts [list debug $lang]
> set link_opts [list debug shlib=${libobj1}]
>
> + set target_libobj2 [gdb_load_shlib $libobj2 -only-download]
> +
> if {$dlopen} {
> - lappend main_opts "additional_flags=-DSHLIB_NAME=\"$libobj2\""
> + lappend main_opts "additional_flags=-DSHLIB_NAME=\"$target_libobj2\""
> lappend link_opts "shlib_load"
> } else {
> lappend link_opts "shlib=${libobj2}"
> @@ -79,7 +81,7 @@ proc test {hidden dlopen version_id_main lang} {
>
> clean_restart $executable
> gdb_load_shlib $libobj1
> - gdb_load_shlib $libobj2
> + gdb_load_shlib $libobj2 -no-download
>
> if ![runto_main] {
> return -1
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> index e2cda30b95a..5328afb27e8 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> @@ -5873,24 +5873,46 @@ proc gdb_remote_download {dest fromfile {tofile {}}} {
> #
> # Copy the listed library to the target.
>
> -proc gdb_load_shlib { file } {
> +proc gdb_load_shlib { file args } {
> global gdb_spawn_id
The comments on this function will need updating for a final version of
this patch.
Otherwise, looks good.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> - if ![info exists gdb_spawn_id] {
> - perror "gdb_load_shlib: GDB is not running"
> + set download 1
> + set solib-search-path 1
> + parse_args {
> + {no-download}
> + {only-download}
> + }
> + if { ${no-download} && ${only-download} } {
> + perror \
> + "gdb_load_shlib: Cannot use both -no-download and -only-download"
> + }
> + if { ${no-download} } {
> + set download 0
> + }
> + if { ${only-download} } {
> + set solib-search-path 0
> }
>
> - set dest [gdb_remote_download target [shlib_target_file $file]]
> + set dest ""
> + if { $download } {
> + set dest [gdb_remote_download target [shlib_target_file $file]]
> + }
>
> - if {[is_remote target]} {
> - # If the target is remote, we need to tell gdb where to find the
> - # libraries.
> - #
> - # We could set this even when not testing remotely, but a user
> - # generally won't set it unless necessary. In order to make the tests
> - # more like the real-life scenarios, we don't set it for local testing.
> - gdb_test "set solib-search-path [file dirname $file]" "" \
> - "set solib-search-path for [file tail $file]"
> + if { ${solib-search-path} } {
> + if ![info exists gdb_spawn_id] {
> + perror "gdb_load_shlib: GDB is not running"
> + }
> +
> + if {[is_remote target]} {
> + # If the target is remote, we need to tell gdb where to find the
> + # libraries.
> + #
> + # We could set this even when not testing remotely, but a user
> + # generally won't set it unless necessary. In order to make the tests
> + # more like the real-life scenarios, we don't set it for local testing.
> + gdb_test "set solib-search-path [file dirname $file]" "" \
> + "set solib-search-path for [file tail $file]"
> + }
> }
>
> return $dest
> --
> 2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-25 16:29 [PATCH 0/7] introduce get_runtime_path Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-10-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] [gdb/testsuite] Adding function to find runtime path to support remote execution for testsuite Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-10-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] [gdb/testsuite] fix test gdb.base/print-file-var.exp for remote execution Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-11-06 10:54 ` Tom de Vries
2022-11-07 13:32 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2022-11-07 13:49 ` Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-11-07 16:44 ` Tom de Vries
2022-11-15 14:39 ` Tom de Vries
2022-11-07 16:18 ` Tom de Vries
2022-11-07 13:55 ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-07 16:15 ` Tom de Vries
2022-10-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] [gdb/testsuite] fix test gdb.base/jit-reader-exec.exp " Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-10-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] [gdb/testsuite] fix test gdb.base/solib-vanish.exp " Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-10-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] [gdb/testsuite] fix test gdb.base/infcall-exec.exp " Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-10-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] [gdb/testsuite] fix test gdb.base/info-shared.exp " Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-10-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] [gdb/testsuite] fix test gdb.base/jit-elf-so.exp " Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-10-29 9:20 ` [PATCH 0/7] introduce get_runtime_path Andrew Burgess
2022-11-01 9:19 ` Ivan Tetyushkin
2022-11-05 14:39 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cz9yc2kz.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ivan.tetyushkin@syntacore.com \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).