public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] gdb: fix assert when quitting GDB while a thread is stepping
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:11:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fse32sa0.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121171213.1414366-4-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>

Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> writes:

> From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
>
> This commit addresses one of the issues identified in PR gdb/28275.
>
> Bug gdb/28275 identifies a number of situations in which this assert:
>
>   Assertion `!proc_target->commit_resumed_state' failed.
>
> could be triggered.  There's actually a number of similar places where
> this assert is found in GDB, the two of interest in gdb/28275 are in
> target_wait and target_stop.
>
> In one of the comments:
>
>   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275#c1
>
> steps to trigger the assertion within target_stop were identified when
> using a modified version of the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test
> script.
>
> In the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test, we attach to a
> multi-threaded inferior, and continue the inferior in asynchronous
> (background) mode.  Each thread is continuously hitting a conditional
> breakpoint where the condition is always false.  While the inferior is
> running we detach.  The goal is that we detach while GDB is performing a
> step-over for the conditional breakpoint in at least one thread.
>
> While detaching, if a step-over is in progress, then GDB has to
> complete the step over before we can detach.  This involves calling
> target_stop and target_wait (see prepare_for_detach).
>
> As far as gdb/28275 is concerned, the interesting part here, is the
> the process_stratum_target::commit_resumed_state variable must be
> false when target_stop and target_wait are called.
>
> This is currently ensured because, in detach_command (infrun.c), we
> create an instance of scoped_disable_commit_resumed, this ensures that
> when target_detach is called, ::commit_resumed_state will be false.
>
> The modification to the test that I propose here, and which exposed
> the bug, is that, instead of using "detach" to detach from the
> inferior, we instead use "quit".  Quitting GDB after attaching to an
> inferior will cause GDB to first detach, and then exit.
>
> When we quit GDB we end up calling target_detach via a different code
> path, the stack looks like:
>
>   #0 target_detach
>   #1 kill_or_detach
>   #2 quit_force
>   #3 quit_command
>
> Along this path there is no scoped_disable_commit_resumed created.
> ::commit_resumed_state can be true when we reach prepare_for_detach,
> which calls target_wait and target_stop, so the assertion will trigger.
>
> In this commit, I propose fixing this by adding the creation of a
> scoped_disable_commit_resumed into target_detach.  This will ensure
> that ::commit_resumed_state is false when calling prepare_for_detach
> from within target_detach.
>
> I did consider placing the scoped_disable_commit_resumed in
> prepare_for_detach, however, placing it in target_detach ensures that
> the target's commit_resumed_state flag is left to false if the detached
> inferior was the last one for that target.  It's the same rationale as
> for patch "gdb: disable commit resumed in target_kill" that comes later
> in this series, but for detach instead of kill.
>
> detach_command still includes a scoped_disable_commit_resumed too, but I
> think it is still relevant to cover the resumption at the end of the
> function.
>
> Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275
> Change-Id: Ie128f7aba6ef0e018859275eca372e6ea738e96f

LGTM.  Thanks for taking this into your series.

Thanks,
Andrew

> ---
>  gdb/target.c                                  |  5 ++
>  .../gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp          | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
> index 74925e139dc1..4a22885b82f1 100644
> --- a/gdb/target.c
> +++ b/gdb/target.c
> @@ -2535,6 +2535,9 @@ target_preopen (int from_tty)
>  void
>  target_detach (inferior *inf, int from_tty)
>  {
> +  /* Thread's don't need to be resumed until the end of this function.  */
> +  scoped_disable_commit_resumed disable_commit_resumed ("detaching");
> +
>    /* After we have detached, we will clear the register cache for this inferior
>       by calling registers_changed_ptid.  We must save the pid_ptid before
>       detaching, as the target detach method will clear inf->pid.  */
> @@ -2565,6 +2568,8 @@ target_detach (inferior *inf, int from_tty)
>       inferior_ptid matches save_pid_ptid, but in our case, it does not
>       call it, as inferior_ptid has been reset.  */
>    reinit_frame_cache ();
> +
> +  disable_commit_resumed.reset_and_commit ();
>  }
>  
>  void
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp
> index ad9b08f549ea..d2cb52423d98 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp
> @@ -284,6 +284,56 @@ proc_with_prefix test_detach_command {condition_eval target_non_stop non_stop di
>      kill_wait_spawned_process $test_spawn_id
>  }
>  
> +# Similar to the proc above, but this time, instead of detaching using
> +# the 'detach' command, we quit GDB, this will also trigger a detach, but
> +# through a slightly different path, which can expose different bugs.
> +proc_with_prefix test_detach_quit {condition_eval target_non_stop \
> +	non_stop displaced} {
> +    # If debugging with target remote, check whether the all-stop variant
> +    # of the RSP is being used.  If so, we can't run the background tests.
> +    if {!$non_stop
> +	&& [target_info exists gdb_protocol]
> +	&& ([target_info gdb_protocol] == "remote"
> +	    || [target_info gdb_protocol] == "extended-remote")} {
> +	start_gdb_for_test $condition_eval $target_non_stop \
> +	    $non_stop $displaced
> +
> +	gdb_test_multiple "maint show target-non-stop" "" {
> +	    -wrap -re "(is|currently) on.*" {
> +	    }
> +	    -wrap -re "(is|currently) off.*" {
> +		return
> +	    }
> +	}
> +    }
> +
> +    set test_spawn_id [spawn_wait_for_attach $::binfile]
> +    set testpid [spawn_id_get_pid $test_spawn_id]
> +
> +    set attempts 3
> +    for {set attempt 1} { $attempt <= $attempts } { incr attempt } {
> +	with_test_prefix "iter $attempt" {
> +
> +	    start_gdb_for_test $condition_eval $target_non_stop \
> +		$non_stop $displaced
> +
> +	    if {![prepare_test_iter $testpid $non_stop \
> +		      $attempt $attempts "$::decimal"]} {
> +		kill_wait_spawned_process $test_spawn_id
> +		return
> +	    }
> +
> +	    gdb_test_multiple "with confirm off -- quit" "" {
> +		eof {
> +		    pass $gdb_test_name
> +		}
> +	    }
> +	}
> +    }
> +
> +    kill_wait_spawned_process $test_spawn_id
> +}
> +
>  # The test program exits after a while, in case GDB crashes.  Make it
>  # wait at least as long as we may wait before declaring a time out
>  # failure.
> @@ -331,6 +381,8 @@ foreach_with_prefix breakpoint-condition-evaluation {"host" "target"} {
>  	    foreach_with_prefix displaced {"off" "auto"} {
>  		test_detach_command ${breakpoint-condition-evaluation} \
>  		    ${target-non-stop} ${non-stop} ${displaced}
> +		test_detach_quit ${breakpoint-condition-evaluation} \
> +		    ${target-non-stop} ${non-stop} ${displaced}
>  	    }
>  	}
>      }
> -- 
> 2.38.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-28 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 17:12 [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix some commit_resumed_state assertion failures (PR 28275) Simon Marchi
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] gdb/testsuite: remove global declarations in gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp Simon Marchi
2022-11-28 11:43   ` Andrew Burgess
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] gdb/testsuite: refactor gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp Simon Marchi
2022-11-28 12:05   ` Andrew Burgess
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] gdb: fix assert when quitting GDB while a thread is stepping Simon Marchi
2022-11-28 12:11   ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2022-11-28 13:03     ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] gdbserver: switch to right process in find_one_thread Simon Marchi
2022-11-28 13:30   ` Andrew Burgess
2022-11-28 14:09     ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] gdb: disable commit resumed in target_kill Simon Marchi
2022-11-28 13:44   ` Andrew Burgess
2022-11-28 14:12     ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fse32sa0.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).