From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: write requests to gdb.log
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:59:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilgutgvi.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230106185729.42372-4-simon.marchi@efficios.com> (Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches's message of "Fri, 6 Jan 2023 13:57:23 -0500")
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
Simon> This helps following what happens when reading gdb.log. The downside is
Simon> that it becomes harder to tell what text is from GDB and what text is
Simon> going to GDB, but I think that seeing responses without seeing requests
Simon> is even more confusing. At least, the lines are prefix with >>>, so
Simon> when you see this, you know that until the end of the line, it's
Simon> something that was sent to GDB, and not GDB output.
Seems fine to me, and if it is ever annoying, we can always revert it.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-25 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 18:57 [PATCH 0/9] Fix gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp for PIE Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: use gdb_assert in gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 21:58 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: prefix some procs with _ Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 21:59 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: write requests to gdb.log Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 21:59 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2023-01-25 22:01 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 3:01 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 4/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: make dap_request_and_response not catch / issue test result Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: remove catch from dap_read_event Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: pass around dicts instead of ton objects Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 22:04 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 3:29 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-26 14:55 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: rename dap_read_event to dap_wait_for_event_and_check Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: make dap_wait_for_event_and_check return preceding messages Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: fix gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp disassembly test for PIE Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 22:10 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 3:40 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-26 15:08 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 20:21 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-16 16:07 ` [PATCH 0/9] Fix gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp " Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 22:10 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 20:22 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilgutgvi.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).