From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: pass around dicts instead of ton objects
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:29:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99e8075c-3f94-5b51-dc43-b74d2ad84cbd@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a626tgnj.fsf@tromey.com>
On 1/25/23 17:04, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>
> Simon> Change-Id: I2ca47bea355bf459090bae8680c6a917350b5c3f
>
> Probably could use a commit message.
Oops, that was a mistake. I always put at least a little something in
the commit messages, except for the extremely obvious commits.
> The main issue with this is that dicts lose type information from the
> JSON. So, if we ever need to check the type of some value sent by gdb,
> we won't be able to.
Ah, interesting.
> But I suppose we could always just add some new proc that returns the
> TON form and go from there. I don't recall if I've needed any such
> tests yet. Arguably maybe we should write one.
The idea of my change was that we currently did `namespace eval
ton::2dict` pretty much everywhere. So I thought it would be nice to
make it easier on callers and to the ton::2dict for them, that makes the
tests less verbose.
I think we can indeed add intermediary functions that return ton objects
as needed. For instance, have dap_request_and_response_ton can do most
of the work, and have dap_request_and_response be a small wrapper around
it to do the ton::2dict.
Based on this, my commit message would be:
The DAP helper functions generally return TON objects. However, callers
almost all immediately use ton::2dict to convert them to dicts, to
access their contents. This commits makes things a bit simpler for them
by having function return dicts directly instead.
The downside is that the TON objects contain type information. For
instance, a "2" in a TCL dict could have been the integer 2 or the
string "2" in JSON. By converting to TCL dicts, we lose that
information. If some tests specifically want to check the types of some
fields, I think we can add intermediary functions that return TON
objects, without having to complicate other callers who don't care.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 18:57 [PATCH 0/9] Fix gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp for PIE Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: use gdb_assert in gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 21:58 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: prefix some procs with _ Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 21:59 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: write requests to gdb.log Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 21:59 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-25 22:01 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 3:01 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 4/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: make dap_request_and_response not catch / issue test result Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: remove catch from dap_read_event Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: pass around dicts instead of ton objects Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 22:04 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 3:29 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-01-26 14:55 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: rename dap_read_event to dap_wait_for_event_and_check Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: make dap_wait_for_event_and_check return preceding messages Simon Marchi
2023-01-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] gdb/testsuite/dap: fix gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp disassembly test for PIE Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 22:10 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 3:40 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-26 15:08 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 20:21 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-16 16:07 ` [PATCH 0/9] Fix gdb.dap/basic-dap.exp " Simon Marchi
2023-01-25 22:10 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-26 20:22 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99e8075c-3f94-5b51-dc43-b74d2ad84cbd@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).