From: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb/dap] Fix exit race
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:01:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sf1jxggn.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213150141.28034-1-tdevries@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:01:41 +0100")
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
Tom> When running test-case gdb.dap/eof.exp, we're likely to get a coredump due to
Tom> a segfault in new_threadstate.
Tom> - send_gdb("quit")
I think we need a different fix for this.
This patch on its own caused a regression in the internal AdaCore test
suite -- the exit status of gdb is now wrong. Now, I'm not 100% sure
why this is. Like, maybe the AdaCore test suite is killing gdb if it
pauses.
However, I thought I'd try to reproduce this in the gdb test suite. I
wrote the appended.
With this patch in place, dap_shutdown just hangs, which happens because
gdb doesn't exit on its own accord.
I tried adding send_gdb("quit") to Server.main_loop, but of course this
just reintroduces the crash here. But I tend to think this would be the
right thing to do, and so adding some kind of special case in gdb's
Python layer would be appropriate.
Tom
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/dap-support.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/dap-support.exp
index 72c22d00711..54795a34e39 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/dap-support.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/dap-support.exp
@@ -400,6 +400,15 @@ proc dap_check_log_file_re { re } {
proc dap_shutdown {{terminate false}} {
dap_check_request_and_response "shutdown" disconnect \
[format {o terminateDebuggee [l %s]} $terminate]
+
+ # Check gdb's exit status.
+ global gdb_spawn_id
+ set result [wait -i $gdb_spawn_id]
+ gdb_assert {[lindex $result 2] == 0}
+ gdb_assert {[lindex $result 3] == 0}
+
+ clear_gdb_spawn_id
+
dap_check_log_file
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 15:01 Tom de Vries
2024-02-13 18:10 ` Tom Tromey
2024-02-14 15:39 ` Tom de Vries
2024-02-14 15:46 ` Tom Tromey
2024-02-23 17:01 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2024-02-23 21:08 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sf1jxggn.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tromey@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).