From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [gdb/symtab] Fix data race on per_cu->dwarf_version
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 12:51:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1x8u2xd.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c75174c-8468-ba23-a30d-c8f99dc9589a@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's message of "Sat, 2 Jul 2022 13:07:09 +0200")
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
Tom> Fix this by setting the field earlier, in read_comp_units_from_section.
Thanks.
Tom> The write in cutu_reader::cutu_reader() is still needed, in case
Tom> read_comp_units_from_section is not used (run the test-case with say, target
Tom> board cc-with-gdb-index).
I wonder if we should just change this code to always scan the DWARF
just enough to read the headers. Like, would that really be so much
slower? (Eons ago I thought so but now I don't really know.) If it
would simplify the code it seems like it would be a net win.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-29 15:29 [PATCH 1/5] [COVER-LETTER, RFC] Fix some fsanitize=thread issues in gdb's cooked index Tom de Vries
2022-06-29 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] [gdb/symtab] Fix data race on per_cu->dwarf_version Tom de Vries
2022-07-01 11:16 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-02 11:07 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-04 18:51 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2022-07-04 19:43 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-04 19:53 ` Tom Tromey
2022-06-29 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] [gdb/symtab] Work around fsanitize=address false positive for per_cu->lang Tom de Vries
2022-06-29 17:38 ` Pedro Alves
2022-06-29 18:25 ` Pedro Alves
2022-06-29 18:28 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-04 7:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] [gdb/symtab] Work around fsanitize=address false positive for per_ cu->lang Tom de Vries
2022-07-04 18:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] [gdb/symtab] Work around fsanitize=address false positive for per_cu->lang Tom Tromey
2022-07-04 19:45 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-06 19:20 ` [PATCH] Introduce struct packed template, fix -fsanitize=thread for per_cu fields Pedro Alves
2022-07-07 10:18 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-07 15:26 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-08 14:54 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-12 10:22 ` Tom de Vries
2022-06-29 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] [gdb/symtab] Work around fsanitize=address false positive for per_cu->unit_type Tom de Vries
2022-06-29 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] [gdb/symtab] Fix data race on per_cu->lang Tom de Vries
2022-07-04 18:30 ` Tom Tromey
2022-07-05 8:17 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-05 15:19 ` Tom de Vries
2022-07-06 15:42 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y1x8u2xd.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).