Re: [PATCH] gdb: don't treat empty enums as flag enums

[Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>]

Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> writes:

>>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>
> Andrew> In C++ it is possible to use an empty enum as a strong typedef.  For
> Andrew> example, a user could write:
>
> Andrew>   enum class my_type : unsigned char {};
>
> Andrew> Now my_type can be used like 'unsigned char' except the compiler will
> Andrew> not allow implicit conversion too and from the native 'unsigned char'
> Andrew> type.
>
> ...
> Andrew> I propose adding an extra check here; that is, an empty enum should
> Andrew> never be a flag enum.
>
> Looks good to me, thank you.
>
> Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

Pushed.

Thanks,
Andrew