public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [gdb/testsuite] Handle ptrace operation not permitted in can_spawn_for_attach
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 23:42:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99c9b37f-76fb-4b5a-9e93-19fc8807284f@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240501083433.19966-1-tdevries@suse.de>



On 2024-05-01 04:34, Tom de Vries wrote:
> When running the testsuite on a system with kernel.yama.ptrace_scope set to 1,
> we run into attach failures.
> 
> Fix this by recognizing "ptrace: Operation not permitted" in
> can_spawn_for_attach.
> 
> Tested on aarch64-linux and x86_64-linux.

Hi Tom,

Since this patch, I see some problems in test
gdb.testsuite/gdb-caching-proc-consistency.exp with the native-gdbserver
board:

    ERROR: in testcase /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/gdb-caching-proc-consistency.exp
    ERROR:  gdbserver does not support attach 1186109 without extended-remote
    ERROR:  tcl error code NONE
    ERROR:  tcl error info:
    gdbserver does not support attach 1186109 without extended-remote
        while executing                          
    "error "gdbserver does not support $command without extended-remote""
        (procedure "gdb_test_multiple" line 51)
        invoked from within
    "gdb_test_multiple "attach $test_pid" "can spawn for attach" {
            -re -wrap "$attaching_re\r\n.*ptrace: Operation not permitted\\." {
                # Not permitte..."
        (procedure "gdb_real__can_spawn_for_attach_1" line 27)
        invoked from within
    "gdb_real__can_spawn_for_attach_1"
        ("uplevel" body line 1)
        invoked from within
    "uplevel 2 [list $real_name {*}$args]"
        invoked from within
    "gdb_do_cache_wrap $real_name"
        ("uplevel" body line 2)
        invoked from within
    "uplevel 1 $body"                            
        invoked from within
    ...

Simon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-17  3:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-01  8:34 Tom de Vries
2024-05-01  9:08 ` Tom de Vries
2024-05-06 11:33 ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-17  3:42 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2024-05-17  9:54   ` Tom de Vries
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-18  6:32 Tom de Vries
2024-04-24 19:40 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-24 21:35   ` Tom de Vries
2024-04-26 18:50     ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-01  8:42       ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99c9b37f-76fb-4b5a-9e93-19fc8807284f@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).