RE: [PATCH 0/2] Add more flexibility to inferior call

["Bouhaouel, Mohamed" <mohamed.bouhaouel@intel.com>]

That makes sense, I will re-submit them once the new architecture is posted.

Thanks.
Mohamed


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 2:38 PM
> To: Bouhaouel, Mohamed <mohamed.bouhaouel@intel.com>; gdb-
> patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add more flexibility to inferior call
> 
> On 3/23/23 07:34, Bouhaouel, Mohamed wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback.  These patches are pre-requisite for an Intel
> architecture
> > that has not been yet up-streamed.  Waiting for the architecture to be
> introduced
> > first is likely more logical,  although, such flexibility might be useful for
> > other new architectures.
> >
> > Should I submit a new version of those patches while considering your
> comments
> > or wait to post all together?
> 
> I think it's better to post it with the first architecture that uses it.
> It helps illustrate what the method is for and how it works.  But also,
> if your port never ends up upstream for whatever reason, it doesn't make
> sense to have those methods with no users.
> 
> Simon
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva  
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928