From: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: Zied Guermazi <zied.guermazi@trande.de>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/7] start/stop btrace with coresight etm and parse etm buffer. nat independant
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:21:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB57490D33DEA168C8EFAA6089DEC99@DM8PR11MB5749.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b329be0f-94e6-9cef-f33b-97be9778c4c5@trande.de>
Hello Zied,
+
+ if (!bfun->insn.empty ())
+ bfun->insn.pop_back ();
+ else
+ {
+ /* A valid function must have at least one instruction. */
+ internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
+ _("Attempt to remove last instruction"
+ "from an empty function"));
We just removed an instruction in the then statement, which
could well result in BFUN->INSN to become empty().
The statement about valid functions above may be a bit too
generic. Also, ftrace_new_* () may create empty function
segments.
Isn't it rather that in our use-case, the caller knows that the
function segment cannot be empty?
[Zied] yes, we are sure that we have at least the last executed instruction that raised the breakpoint execption.
Would it make more sense to simply do ‘bfun->insn.pop_back ()’ inside the caller?
Apparently, the caller knows that there must be an instruction so it could safely remove it. If we turn this into a separate function, we need to handle the general case.
[Zied] what will happens in the case of a gap proceeding current instruction, the function is still not created at this point, isn't it?
to be sure that none tries to use the function as a generic one, we can remove it and put the code in the caller function. It is called only once. will this be fine from your point of view?
Yes, I think that would be better. We’re making too many assumptions for a generic function, here, and we can probably eliminate most of the checks when inlined into the sole call site.
Regards,
Markus.
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-10 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 21:33 [PATCH v6 0/7] extend branch tracing to use ARM CoreSight traces Zied Guermazi
2021-05-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] configure gdb build system for supporting btrace on arm processors Zied Guermazi
2021-06-30 12:17 ` Luis Machado
2021-05-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] add btrace coresight related commands Zied Guermazi
2021-06-01 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-01 15:47 ` Zied Guermazi
2021-06-30 12:26 ` Luis Machado
2021-05-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] start/stop btrace with coresight etm and parse etm buffer. nat independant Zied Guermazi
2021-06-22 14:59 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-04-07 16:33 ` Zied Guermazi
2022-04-13 7:00 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-05-10 12:58 ` Zied Guermazi
2022-05-10 13:21 ` Metzger, Markus T [this message]
2021-06-30 12:54 ` Luis Machado
2021-05-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] start/stop btrace with coresight etm and collect etm buffer on linux os Zied Guermazi
2021-06-23 8:00 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-05-12 22:52 ` Zied Guermazi
2022-05-13 5:31 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-06-12 21:02 ` Zied Guermazi
2022-06-20 12:52 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-07-18 19:06 ` Zied Guermazi
2022-07-19 5:04 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-07-21 22:20 ` Zied Guermazi
2022-07-25 14:33 ` Metzger, Markus T
2021-06-30 13:24 ` Luis Machado
2021-05-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] fix issue: gdb hangs in the command following a commad returning with TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_HISTORY Zied Guermazi
2021-06-23 8:08 ` Metzger, Markus T
2021-05-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] add support for coresight btrace via remote protocol Zied Guermazi
2021-06-01 12:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-23 10:59 ` Metzger, Markus T
2021-05-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] adapt btrace testcases for arm target Zied Guermazi
2021-06-22 21:28 ` Lancelot SIX
2021-06-23 14:16 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-05-13 11:08 ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-05-17 9:44 ` Zied Guermazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM8PR11MB57490D33DEA168C8EFAA6089DEC99@DM8PR11MB5749.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=zied.guermazi@trande.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).