public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/m-static.exp regression on Ubuntu 20.04
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:49:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1f8c983-9bbf-99a4-d1a1-18939bc6f88d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd19e56b-6ea3-9bb9-4a3d-b67c05742a85@polymtl.ca>

On 3/24/23 15:17, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 3/23/23 09:47, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> In commit 722c4596034 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/*.exp for remote host"), I
>> needed to change ".*/" into "(.*/)?" in:
>> ...
>> gdb_test "info variable everywhere" \
>>      "File .*/m-static\[.\]h.*const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;"
>> ...
>>
>> However, due to that fact that I got this output:
>> ...
>> (gdb) info variable everywhere^M
>> All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M
>> ^M
>> File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M
>> 8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
>> ^M
>> File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static1.cc:^M
>> 8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
>> ...
>> I decided to make the matching somewhat stricter, to make sure that the two
>> matched lines were subsequent.
>>
>> The commit turned out to be more strict than intended, and caused a regression
>> on Ubuntu 20.04, where the output was instead:
>> ...
>> (gdb) info variable everywhere^M
>> All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M
>> ^M
>> File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M
>> 8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
>> ...
>>
>> At that point I realized I'm looking at a bug (filed as PR symtab/30265),
>> which manifests on openSUSE Leap 15.4 for native and readnow, and on Ubuntu
>> 20.04 for readnow, but not for native.
>>
>> Before my commit, the test-case passed whether the bug manifested or not.
>>
>> After my commit, the test-case only passed when the bug manifested.
>>
>> Fix the test-case regression by reverting to the situation before the commit:
>> pass whether the bug manifests or not.  We could add an xfail for the PR, but
>> I'm expecting a fix soon, so that doesn't look worth the effort.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-linux, both on openSUSE Leap 15.4 and Ubuntu 20.04, both with
>> native and readnow.
>>
>> Reported-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
> 
> For those wondering, this is already pushed :)

Hi Simon,

sorry, forgot to mention that here, thanks for the note.

Thanks,
- Tom


      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23 13:47 Tom de Vries
2023-03-24 14:17 ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-24 14:49   ` Tom de Vries [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c1f8c983-9bbf-99a4-d1a1-18939bc6f88d@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).