* [PATCH] cli-script: use unique_ptr to not leak next struct
@ 2021-05-20 13:06 Alexandra Hájková
2021-05-20 14:55 ` Simon Marchi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexandra Hájková @ 2021-05-20 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
From: Alexandra Hájková <ahajkova@redhat.com>
In cli/cli-script.c, process_next_line() allocates memory
which will eventually end up being assigned to the 'next'
field in struct command_line. However, in a case
recurse_read_control_structure returns 'invalid_control'
this memory is leaked. This commit uses std::unique_ptr
as appropriate to prevent this leakage.
This issue was found by coverity scanning.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2021-05-19 Alexandra Hájková <ahajkova@redhat.com>
* cli/cli-script.h (command_line_up): New unique_ptr typedef.
* cli/cli-script.c (multi_line_command_p): Use unique_ptr
command_line_up instead of struct command_line.
(build_command_line): Likewise.
(get_command_line): Update the cmd function call parameter.
(process_next_line): Use unique_ptr command_line_up instead
of struct command_line.
(recurse_read_control_structure): Change the the type of
next to command_line_up.
(read_command_lines_1): Change type of `next' to be
command_line_up and update all references of `next'
accordingly.
---
gdb/cli/cli-script.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
gdb/cli/cli-script.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-script.c b/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
index ff93523f4da..98463677902 100644
--- a/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
+++ b/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ multi_line_command_p (enum command_control_type type)
/* Allocate, initialize a new command line structure for one of the
control commands (if/while). */
-static struct command_line *
+static command_line_up
build_command_line (enum command_control_type type, const char *args)
{
if (args == NULL || *args == '\0')
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ build_command_line (enum command_control_type type, const char *args)
}
gdb_assert (args != NULL);
- return new struct command_line (type, xstrdup (args));
+ return command_line_up (new command_line (type, xstrdup (args)));
}
/* Build and return a new command structure for the control commands
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ counted_command_line
get_command_line (enum command_control_type type, const char *arg)
{
/* Allocate and build a new command line structure. */
- counted_command_line cmd (build_command_line (type, arg),
+ counted_command_line cmd (build_command_line (type, arg).release (),
command_lines_deleter ());
/* Read in the body of this command. */
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ line_first_arg (const char *p)
Otherwise, only "end" is recognized. */
static enum misc_command_type
-process_next_line (const char *p, struct command_line **command,
+process_next_line (const char *p, command_line_up *command,
int parse_commands,
gdb::function_view<void (const char *)> validator)
@@ -1055,9 +1055,9 @@ process_next_line (const char *p, struct command_line **command,
*command = build_command_line (guile_control, "");
}
else if (p_end - p == 10 && startswith (p, "loop_break"))
- *command = new struct command_line (break_control);
+ *command = command_line_up (new command_line (break_control));
else if (p_end - p == 13 && startswith (p, "loop_continue"))
- *command = new struct command_line (continue_control);
+ *command = command_line_up (new command_line (continue_control));
else
not_handled = 1;
}
@@ -1065,22 +1065,12 @@ process_next_line (const char *p, struct command_line **command,
if (!parse_commands || not_handled)
{
/* A normal command. */
- *command = new struct command_line (simple_control,
- savestring (p, p_end - p));
+ *command = command_line_up (new command_line (simple_control,
+ savestring (p, p_end - p)));
}
if (validator)
- {
- try
- {
- validator ((*command)->line);
- }
- catch (const gdb_exception &ex)
- {
- free_command_lines (command);
- throw;
- }
- }
+ validator ((*command)->line);
/* Nothing special. */
return ok_command;
@@ -1097,10 +1087,11 @@ recurse_read_control_structure (gdb::function_view<const char * ()> read_next_li
{
enum misc_command_type val;
enum command_control_type ret;
- struct command_line *child_tail, *next;
+ struct command_line *child_tail;
counted_command_line *current_body = ¤t_cmd->body_list_0;
+ command_line_up next;
- child_tail = NULL;
+ child_tail = nullptr;
/* Sanity checks. */
if (current_cmd->control_type == simple_control)
@@ -1111,8 +1102,8 @@ recurse_read_control_structure (gdb::function_view<const char * ()> read_next_li
{
dont_repeat ();
- next = NULL;
- val = process_next_line (read_next_line_func (), &next,
+ next = nullptr;
+ val = process_next_line (read_next_line_func (), &next,
current_cmd->control_type != python_control
&& current_cmd->control_type != guile_control
&& current_cmd->control_type != compile_control,
@@ -1144,7 +1135,7 @@ recurse_read_control_structure (gdb::function_view<const char * ()> read_next_li
&& current_body == ¤t_cmd->body_list_0)
{
current_body = ¤t_cmd->body_list_1;
- child_tail = NULL;
+ child_tail = nullptr;
continue;
}
else
@@ -1154,21 +1145,26 @@ recurse_read_control_structure (gdb::function_view<const char * ()> read_next_li
}
}
- if (child_tail)
+ /* Transfer ownership of NEXT to the command's body list. */
+ if (child_tail != nullptr)
{
- child_tail->next = next;
+ child_tail->next = next.release ();
+ child_tail = child_tail->next;
}
else
- *current_body = counted_command_line (next, command_lines_deleter ());
-
- child_tail = next;
+ {
+ child_tail = next.get ();
+ *current_body = counted_command_line (next.release (),
+ command_lines_deleter ());
+ }
/* If the latest line is another control structure, then recurse
on it. */
- if (multi_line_command_p (next->control_type))
+ if (multi_line_command_p (child_tail->control_type))
{
control_level++;
- ret = recurse_read_control_structure (read_next_line_func, next,
+ ret = recurse_read_control_structure (read_next_line_func,
+ child_tail,
validator);
control_level--;
@@ -1240,10 +1236,11 @@ read_command_lines_1 (gdb::function_view<const char * ()> read_next_line_func,
int parse_commands,
gdb::function_view<void (const char *)> validator)
{
- struct command_line *tail, *next;
+ struct command_line *tail;
counted_command_line head (nullptr, command_lines_deleter ());
enum command_control_type ret;
enum misc_command_type val;
+ command_line_up next;
control_level = 0;
tail = NULL;
@@ -1273,7 +1270,7 @@ read_command_lines_1 (gdb::function_view<const char * ()> read_next_line_func,
if (multi_line_command_p (next->control_type))
{
control_level++;
- ret = recurse_read_control_structure (read_next_line_func, next,
+ ret = recurse_read_control_structure (read_next_line_func, next.get (),
validator);
control_level--;
@@ -1281,15 +1278,18 @@ read_command_lines_1 (gdb::function_view<const char * ()> read_next_line_func,
break;
}
+ /* Transfer ownership of NEXT to the HEAD list. */
if (tail)
{
- tail->next = next;
+ tail->next = next.release ();
+ tail = tail->next;
}
else
{
- head = counted_command_line (next, command_lines_deleter ());
+ tail = next.get ();
+ head = counted_command_line (next.release (),
+ command_lines_deleter ());
}
- tail = next;
}
dont_repeat ();
diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-script.h b/gdb/cli/cli-script.h
index 8624bf55839..8c98fdde655 100644
--- a/gdb/cli/cli-script.h
+++ b/gdb/cli/cli-script.h
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ struct command_lines_deleter
/* A reference-counted struct command_line. */
typedef std::shared_ptr<command_line> counted_command_line;
+/* A unique_ptr specialization for command_line. */
+typedef std::unique_ptr<command_line, command_lines_deleter> command_line_up;
+
/* * Structure for saved commands lines (for breakpoints, defined
commands, etc). */
--
2.26.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cli-script: use unique_ptr to not leak next struct
2021-05-20 13:06 [PATCH] cli-script: use unique_ptr to not leak next struct Alexandra Hájková
@ 2021-05-20 14:55 ` Simon Marchi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2021-05-20 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandra Hájková, gdb-patches
On 2021-05-20 9:06 a.m., Alexandra Hájková via Gdb-patches wrote:
> From: Alexandra Hájková <ahajkova@redhat.com>
>
> In cli/cli-script.c, process_next_line() allocates memory
> which will eventually end up being assigned to the 'next'
> field in struct command_line. However, in a case
> recurse_read_control_structure returns 'invalid_control'
> this memory is leaked. This commit uses std::unique_ptr
> as appropriate to prevent this leakage.
>
> This issue was found by coverity scanning.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-05-19 Alexandra Hájková <ahajkova@redhat.com>
>
> * cli/cli-script.h (command_line_up): New unique_ptr typedef.
> * cli/cli-script.c (multi_line_command_p): Use unique_ptr
> command_line_up instead of struct command_line.
> (build_command_line): Likewise.
> (get_command_line): Update the cmd function call parameter.
> (process_next_line): Use unique_ptr command_line_up instead
> of struct command_line.
> (recurse_read_control_structure): Change the the type of
> next to command_line_up.
> (read_command_lines_1): Change type of `next' to be
> command_line_up and update all references of `next'
> accordingly.
LGTM. Just watch out for the ChangeLog indentation, it should only use
tabs.
Thanks!
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-20 14:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-20 13:06 [PATCH] cli-script: use unique_ptr to not leak next struct Alexandra Hájková
2021-05-20 14:55 ` Simon Marchi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).