Re: [PATCH] Mention process_stratum in inferior::priv comment

[John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>]

On 8/14/23 11:07 AM, Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches wrote:
>  From what I can tell, inferior::priv is reserved for the
> process_stratum target.  It seems to me that it has to be, because
> currenlty only such targets use it, and if a target at another stratum
> started using this field, then conflicts could occur.  This patch
> documents this.
> ---
>   gdb/inferior.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/inferior.h b/gdb/inferior.h
> index 712f9b3f330..8f300a5bcc5 100644
> --- a/gdb/inferior.h
> +++ b/gdb/inferior.h
> @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ class inferior : public refcounted_object,
>        attach or handling a fork child.  */
>     bool in_initial_library_scan = false;
>   
> -  /* Private data used by the target vector implementation.  */
> +  /* Private data used by the process_stratum target.  */
>     std::unique_ptr<private_inferior> priv;
>   
>     /* HAS_EXIT_CODE is true if the inferior exited with an exit code.


Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>

The only two current users are darwin-nat and remote (and I'm
about to add one in fbsd-nat)

-- 
John Baldwin