public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/26] gdbserver: zero-out register values in regcache-discard
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 23:36:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5de2715-ef01-4f67-8185-ff17fe040196@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877c74ccb7fb99d36242d9246d2824f181752a5a.1677582745.git.tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>



On 2023-02-28 06:28, Tankut Baris Aktemur via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Zero-out register values when a regcache is discarded so that we avoid
> garbage values left in the buffer.
> ---
>  gdbserver/regcache.cc | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdbserver/regcache.cc b/gdbserver/regcache.cc
> index 2befb30e337..644f436c681 100644
> --- a/gdbserver/regcache.cc
> +++ b/gdbserver/regcache.cc
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ regcache_invalidate (void)
>  void
>  regcache::discard ()
>  {
> +  memset (registers, 0, tdesc->registers_size);
>  #ifndef IN_PROCESS_AGENT
>    memset ((void *) register_status, REG_UNKNOWN, tdesc->reg_defs.size ());
>  #endif
> @@ -149,16 +150,17 @@ regcache::initialize (const target_desc *tdesc,
>    if (regbuf == NULL)
>      {
>  #ifndef IN_PROCESS_AGENT
> -      /* Make sure to zero-initialize the register cache when it is
> -	 created, in case there are registers the target never
> -	 fetches.  This way they'll read as zero instead of
> -	 garbage.  */
>        this->tdesc = tdesc;
>        this->registers
> -	= (unsigned char *) xcalloc (1, tdesc->registers_size);
> +	= (unsigned char *) xmalloc (tdesc->registers_size);
>        this->registers_owned = true;
>        this->register_status
>  	= (enum register_status *) xmalloc (tdesc->reg_defs.size ());
> +
> +      /* Make sure to zero-initialize the register cache when it is
> +	 created, in case there are registers the target never
> +	 fetches.  This way they'll read as zero instead of
> +	 garbage.  */
>        discard ();
>  #else
>        gdb_assert_not_reached ("can't allocate memory from the heap");

Just curious, if we read and use the contents of a register that isn't
REG_VALID, it's a bug, right?  If so, shouldn't we instead make sure
this never happens?  After all, for a register that is not REG_VALID, a
value of 0 is just as much a "garbage value" as any other value.

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-22  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-28 11:27 [PATCH 00/26] gdbserver: refactor regcache and allow gradually populating Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-02-28 11:27 ` [PATCH 01/26] gdbserver: convert init_register_cache into regcache::initialize Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:12   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 02/26] gdbserver: convert new_register_cache into a regcache constructor Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:19   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 03/26] gdbserver: by-pass regcache to access tdesc only Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:22   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 04/26] gdbserver: boolify and defaultize the 'fetch' parameter of get_thread_regcache Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:24   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 05/26] gdbserver: add a pointer to the owner thread in regcache Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:28   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 06/26] gdbserver: turn part of get_thread_regcache into regcache::fetch Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:48   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 07/26] gdbserver: convert regcache_cpy into regcache::copy_from Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:50   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 08/26] gdbserver: convert free_register_cache into a destructor of regcache Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 20:57   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 09/26] gdbserver: extract out regcache::invalidate and regcache::discard Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 21:08   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 10/26] gdbserver: convert registers_to_string into regcache::registers_to_string Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 21:13   ` Simon Marchi
2023-12-21 21:19     ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 11/26] gdbserver: convert registers_from_string into regcache::registers_from_string Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 12/26] gdbserver: convert supply_regblock to regcache::supply_regblock Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 21:23   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 13/26] gdbserver: convert register_data into regcache::register_data Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 21:26   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 14/26] gdbserver: introduce and use regcache::set_register_status Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 21:30   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 15/26] gdbserver: check for nullptr condition in regcache::get_register_status Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-21 21:32   ` Simon Marchi
2023-12-21 21:34   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 16/26] gdbserver: boolify regcache fields Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  3:20   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 17/26] gdbserver: rename regcache's registers_valid to registers_fetched Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  3:23   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 18/26] gdbsupport: fix a typo in a comment in common-regcache.h Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  3:24   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 19/26] gdbserver: fix the declared type of register_status in regcache Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  3:35   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 20/26] gdbserver: make some regcache fields private Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  3:39   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 21/26] gdbserver: use REG_UNKNOWN for a regcache's register statuses Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  4:32   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 22/26] gdbserver: zero-out register values in regcache-discard Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  4:36   ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 23/26] gdbserver: set register statuses in registers_from_string Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  4:40   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 24/26] gdbserver: return tracked register status in regcache_raw_read_unsigned Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  4:42   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 25/26] gdbserver: refuse null argument in regcache::supply_regblock Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22  4:54   ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 26/26] gdbserver: allow gradually populating and selectively storing a regcache Tankut Baris Aktemur
2023-12-22 16:25   ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-07 20:39 ` [PATCH 00/26] gdbserver: refactor regcache and allow gradually populating Tom Tromey
2023-03-13 14:33   ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2023-03-28 13:42 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2023-06-20 12:58 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d5de2715-ef01-4f67-8185-ff17fe040196@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).