Re: [PATCH] rs6000, unwind-on-each-instruction fix.

[Carl Love <cel@linux.ibm.com>]

Tom:

On 2/8/24 10:55, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Carl" == Carl Love <cel@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> Carl> The patch fixes all 10 regression failures for the test.  The patch
> Carl> has been tested on Power 9 and Power 10 with no additional regression
> Carl> test failures.
> 
> Carl> Please let me know if this patch is acceptable to GDB mainline.
> 
> I think it would be best if someone familiar with PPC reviewed this.
> 
> FWIW it looks reasonable to me.
> 
> Carl> +      /* The PC is found in the link register.  */
> Carl> +      cache->saved_regs[gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch)] =
> Carl> +	cache->saved_regs[tdep->ppc_lr_regnum];
> 
> Here the '=' should go on the 2nd line.

Yes, the "=" is on the wrong line.  I fixed it locally.  Thanks for catching
that.  

Hopefully Ulrich will get a chance to look at the patch.  I think he
was out of the office for a few days.  I am thinking the patch got overlooked
with all of his other mail.  

                     Carl