public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: ☠ Buildbot (GNU Toolchain): binutils-gdb - failed test (failure) (master)
       [not found] <20220912083142.E79913857004@sourceware.org>
@ 2022-09-12  8:46 ` Tom de Vries
  2022-11-11 17:14   ` Mark Wielaard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2022-09-12  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches, Mark Wielaard, Simon Marchi

On 9/12/22 10:31, builder@sourceware.org wrote:
> A new failure has been detected on builder gdb-fedora-x86_64 while building binutils-gdb.
> 
> Full details are available at:
>      https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/74/builds/1088
> 
> Build state: failed test (failure)

I looked at gdb.log, and found these FAILs:
...
(gdb) maintenance selftest copy\a_\a
copy_bitwise          copy_integer_to_size
(gdb) maintenance selftest copy_PASS: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: 
test_completion: tab complete "maintenance selftest copy"
FAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: test_completion: tab complete "maintenance 
selftest copy" (clearing input line) (timeout)
^Cmaintenance selftest copy_bit\aQuit
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: test_completion: tab complete 
"maintenance selftest copy_bit"
Quit
...

This looks like the well-known 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27813 to me.

Maybe we should move the completion tests out of this test-case?

Thanks,
- Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: ☠ Buildbot (GNU Toolchain): binutils-gdb - failed test (failure) (master)
  2022-09-12  8:46 ` ☠ Buildbot (GNU Toolchain): binutils-gdb - failed test (failure) (master) Tom de Vries
@ 2022-11-11 17:14   ` Mark Wielaard
  2022-11-11 17:48     ` Tom de Vries
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Wielaard @ 2022-11-11 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom de Vries, gdb-patches, Simon Marchi

Hi Tom,

On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 10:46 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 9/12/22 10:31, builder@sourceware.org wrote:
> > A new failure has been detected on builder gdb-fedora-x86_64 while
> > building binutils-gdb.
> > 
> > Full details are available at:
> >      
> > https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/74/builds/1088
> > 
> > Build state: failed test (failure)
> 
> I looked at gdb.log, and found these FAILs:
> ...
> (gdb) maintenance selftest copy\a_\a
> copy_bitwise          copy_integer_to_size
> (gdb) maintenance selftest copy_PASS: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: 
> test_completion: tab complete "maintenance selftest copy"
> FAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: test_completion: tab complete
> "maintenance 
> selftest copy" (clearing input line) (timeout)
> ^Cmaintenance selftest copy_bit\aQuit
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: test_completion: tab complete 
> "maintenance selftest copy_bit"
> Quit
> ...
> 
> This looks like the well-known 
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27813 to me.
> 
> Maybe we should move the completion tests out of this test-case?

Saw this fail a couple of other times as well. Latest:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/170/builds/1088

Do you propose to split out the test_completion from
gdb.gdb/unittest.exp or to just remove it from the list of TESTS for
the buildbot make check-gdb target?

Cheers,

Mark

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: ☠ Buildbot (GNU Toolchain): binutils-gdb - failed test (failure) (master)
  2022-11-11 17:14   ` Mark Wielaard
@ 2022-11-11 17:48     ` Tom de Vries
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2022-11-11 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Wielaard, gdb-patches, Simon Marchi

On 11/11/22 18:14, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 10:46 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 9/12/22 10:31, builder@sourceware.org wrote:
>>> A new failure has been detected on builder gdb-fedora-x86_64 while
>>> building binutils-gdb.
>>>
>>> Full details are available at:
>>>       
>>> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/74/builds/1088
>>>
>>> Build state: failed test (failure)
>>
>> I looked at gdb.log, and found these FAILs:
>> ...
>> (gdb) maintenance selftest copy\a_\a
>> copy_bitwise          copy_integer_to_size
>> (gdb) maintenance selftest copy_PASS: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp:
>> test_completion: tab complete "maintenance selftest copy"
>> FAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: test_completion: tab complete
>> "maintenance
>> selftest copy" (clearing input line) (timeout)
>> ^Cmaintenance selftest copy_bit\aQuit
>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: test_completion: tab complete
>> "maintenance selftest copy_bit"
>> Quit
>> ...
>>
>> This looks like the well-known
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27813 to me.
>>
>> Maybe we should move the completion tests out of this test-case?
> 
> Saw this fail a couple of other times as well. Latest:
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/170/builds/1088
> 

Hi Mark,

I did look at that failure, but the failure mode is different:
...
(gdb) maintenance selftest copy\a_\a
copy_bitwise          copy_integer_to_size
FAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: test_completion: tab complete "maintenance 
selftest copy" (second tab) (timeout)
Quit
...

I don't know what's causing that.  Maybe some system readline vs. gdb 
readline issue, just a guess.

> Do you propose to split out the test_completion from
> gdb.gdb/unittest.exp or to just remove it from the list of TESTS for
> the buildbot make check-gdb target?
The first.

Thanks,
- Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-11 17:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20220912083142.E79913857004@sourceware.org>
2022-09-12  8:46 ` ☠ Buildbot (GNU Toolchain): binutils-gdb - failed test (failure) (master) Tom de Vries
2022-11-11 17:14   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-11-11 17:48     ` Tom de Vries

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).