public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/9050] BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker GCC C++
       [not found] <20050514181800.9050.ted@midg3t.net>
@ 2009-01-22  0:22 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
  2009-01-22  0:24 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
  2009-01-22  3:46 ` drow at sources dot redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-01-22  0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com  2009-01-22 00:22 -------
Did anyone get a chance to confirm this is fixed in a more recent GDB?

I'll probably close this as fixed in a few days, if there's no feedback.

(I just noticed PR9073, which showed the same error on sparc/solaris/gcc.)


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |WAITING
            Summary|BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker|BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker
                   |GNU/Linux GCC C++           |GCC C++


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug gdb/9050] BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker GCC C++
       [not found] <20050514181800.9050.ted@midg3t.net>
  2009-01-22  0:22 ` [Bug gdb/9050] BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker GCC C++ pedro at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-01-22  0:24 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
  2009-01-22  3:46 ` drow at sources dot redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-01-22  0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com  2009-01-22 00:24 -------
*** Bug 9073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pdubuc at cas dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug gdb/9050] BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker GCC C++
       [not found] <20050514181800.9050.ted@midg3t.net>
  2009-01-22  0:22 ` [Bug gdb/9050] BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker GCC C++ pedro at codesourcery dot com
  2009-01-22  0:24 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-01-22  3:46 ` drow at sources dot redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: drow at sources dot redhat dot com @ 2009-01-22  3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com  2009-01-22 03:46 -------
I am positive this is fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-22  3:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20050514181800.9050.ted@midg3t.net>
2009-01-22  0:22 ` [Bug gdb/9050] BFD: bfd_cache_lookup_worker GCC C++ pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-22  0:24 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-22  3:46 ` drow at sources dot redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).