public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/9888] New: .c file included instead of .h file in exec.c
@ 2009-02-23 18:08 richard dot stuckey at arc dot com
  2009-02-23 18:13 ` [Bug gdb/9888] " drow at sources dot redhat dot com
  2009-02-23 19:24 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: richard dot stuckey at arc dot com @ 2009-02-23 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

In the file exec.c, there is the include directive

#include "arch-utils.c"

I suspect that this should be "arch-utils.h" - it is hard to see why the code
and data of this module should be duplicated in the built gdb, and gdb works
perfectly well when the .c is changed to .h.

-- 
           Summary: .c file included instead of .h file in exec.c
           Product: gdb
           Version: 6.8
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gdb
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: richard dot stuckey at arc dot com
                CC: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9888

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9888] .c file included instead of .h file in exec.c
  2009-02-23 18:08 [Bug gdb/9888] New: .c file included instead of .h file in exec.c richard dot stuckey at arc dot com
@ 2009-02-23 18:13 ` drow at sources dot redhat dot com
  2009-02-23 19:24 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: drow at sources dot redhat dot com @ 2009-02-23 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com  2009-02-23 18:13 -------
2008-04-16  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

        PR gdb/2445
        * exec.c: Correct "arch-utils.h" include.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9888

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9888] .c file included instead of .h file in exec.c
  2009-02-23 18:08 [Bug gdb/9888] New: .c file included instead of .h file in exec.c richard dot stuckey at arc dot com
  2009-02-23 18:13 ` [Bug gdb/9888] " drow at sources dot redhat dot com
@ 2009-02-23 19:24 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2009-02-23 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com  2009-02-23 19:24 -------
*** Bug 9889 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9888

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-23 19:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-23 18:08 [Bug gdb/9888] New: .c file included instead of .h file in exec.c richard dot stuckey at arc dot com
2009-02-23 18:13 ` [Bug gdb/9888] " drow at sources dot redhat dot com
2009-02-23 19:24 ` tromey at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).