public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/11547] New: Better c++-0x lambda support
@ 2010-04-27 17:08 fuscated at gmail dot com
  2010-04-27 17:09 ` [Bug c++/11547] " fuscated at gmail dot com
  2010-04-27 19:11 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fuscated at gmail dot com @ 2010-04-27 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

Getting the value 'sum' inside the lambda function doesn't work.

1. Compile the attached source (g++ -std=c++0x) with gcc 4.5.0+
2. Place a breakpoint on line 18 (first line of the lambda)
3. Run the debuggee
4. When the breakpoint is hit evaluate 'sum' with 'print sum' command:

> print sum
$1 = 32767
> print this->__sum
$2 = (int &) @0x7fffffffddec: 0

-- 
           Summary: Better c++-0x lambda support
           Product: gdb
           Version: 7.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: fuscated at gmail dot com
                CC: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11547

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11547] Better c++-0x lambda support
  2010-04-27 17:08 [Bug c++/11547] New: Better c++-0x lambda support fuscated at gmail dot com
@ 2010-04-27 17:09 ` fuscated at gmail dot com
  2010-04-27 19:11 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fuscated at gmail dot com @ 2010-04-27 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From fuscated at gmail dot com  2010-04-27 17:09 -------
Created an attachment (id=4754)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4754&action=view)
the source


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11547

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11547] Better c++-0x lambda support
  2010-04-27 17:08 [Bug c++/11547] New: Better c++-0x lambda support fuscated at gmail dot com
  2010-04-27 17:09 ` [Bug c++/11547] " fuscated at gmail dot com
@ 2010-04-27 19:11 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-27 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com  2010-04-27 19:11 -------
g++ is not emitting the necessary debuginfo for this to work.
That gdb can still try to resolve "sum" seems to be a gdb bug
(though I did not look into this part too closely, perhaps it
is also some debuginfo problem).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at redhat dot com
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-04-27 19:11:49
               date|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11547

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-27 19:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-27 17:08 [Bug c++/11547] New: Better c++-0x lambda support fuscated at gmail dot com
2010-04-27 17:09 ` [Bug c++/11547] " fuscated at gmail dot com
2010-04-27 19:11 ` tromey at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).