public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
[not found] <bug-11555-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-10-21 17:03 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2022-10-21 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I think this was fixed ages ago.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-30 18:26 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
@ 2010-05-04 14:24 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: swagiaal at redhat dot com @ 2010-05-04 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com 2010-05-04 14:24 -------
I am unassigning this bug since the lookup problem is fixed.
It can be closed when the stat issued is fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|swagiaal at redhat dot com |unassigned at sourceware dot
| |org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-30 18:04 ` tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2010-04-30 18:26 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-05-04 14:24 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com @ 2010-04-30 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com 2010-04-30 18:26 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Created an attachment (id=4757)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4757&action=view)
> > Stack trace while gdb is busy inserting breakpoint
> >
> > Here is the stack trace. I will try to create an example.
> This looks like:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00466.html
> It would be interesting to know if that patch helps.
Yes, it helps. I had about 4000 partial symbol tables, and the line
breakpoints used absolute paths.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-30 15:46 ` jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2010-04-30 18:04 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 18:26 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-05-04 14:24 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-30 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com 2010-04-30 18:04 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=4757)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4757&action=view)
> Stack trace while gdb is busy inserting breakpoint
>
> Here is the stack trace. I will try to create an example.
This looks like:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00466.html
It would be interesting to know if that patch helps.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-30 14:38 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
@ 2010-04-30 15:46 ` jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
2010-04-30 18:04 ` tromey at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com @ 2010-04-30 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com 2010-04-30 15:46 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> This might be the same issue as:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11408
>
> could you try with this patch:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4674&action=view
The patch appears to fix my problem. Thanks!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-30 14:27 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
@ 2010-04-30 14:38 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-04-30 15:46 ` jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com @ 2010-04-30 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com 2010-04-30 14:38 -------
Created an attachment (id=4757)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4757&action=view)
Stack trace while gdb is busy inserting breakpoint
Here is the stack trace. I will try to create an example.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-30 13:51 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
@ 2010-04-30 14:27 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 14:38 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: swagiaal at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-30 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com 2010-04-30 14:27 -------
Okay looks like this is a different bug then.
Would you be able to make a small testcase to reproduce this ?
If not, could you get a stack trace of gdb while it is hung
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-30 9:13 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
@ 2010-04-30 13:51 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-04-30 14:27 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com @ 2010-04-30 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com 2010-04-30 13:50 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> This might be the same issue as:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11408
> could you try with this patch:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4674&action=view
bug11408 should already be fixed if I check out the latest gdb sources from
7.1 branch, right (done today)? At least I found a ChangeLog saying this.
The sluggishness while stepping seems to be gone, but inserting a break point
is still damn slow.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
2010-04-28 20:07 ` [Bug gdb/11555] " swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-04-29 15:14 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
@ 2010-04-30 9:13 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-04-30 13:51 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com @ 2010-04-30 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jens dot elmenthaler at
| |verigy dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
2010-04-28 20:07 ` [Bug gdb/11555] " swagiaal at redhat dot com
@ 2010-04-29 15:14 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 9:13 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: swagiaal at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-29 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com 2010-04-29 15:14 -------
This might be the same issue as:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11408
could you try with this patch:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4674&action=view
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2010-04-28 20:07 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-04-29 15:14 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: swagiaal at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-28 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware dot|swagiaal at redhat dot com
|org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-21 17:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-11555-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2022-10-21 17:03 ` [Bug gdb/11555] 100% CPU for minutes trying to print expresion tromey at sourceware dot org
2010-04-28 19:56 [Bug gdb/11555] New: " jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
2010-04-28 20:07 ` [Bug gdb/11555] " swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-04-29 15:14 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 9:13 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-04-30 13:51 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-04-30 14:27 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 14:38 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-04-30 15:46 ` jlquinn at us dot ibm dot com
2010-04-30 18:04 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 18:26 ` jens dot elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2010-05-04 14:24 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).