public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/14877] New: skip.exp do not take function arg evaluation order into account
@ 2012-11-26 8:39 wong.kwongyuan at gmail dot com
2012-11-26 9:18 ` [Bug testsuite/14877] " qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: wong.kwongyuan at gmail dot com @ 2012-11-26 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14877
Bug #: 14877
Summary: skip.exp do not take function arg evaluation order
into account
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: wong.kwongyuan@gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
skip.exp/skip.c in gdb.base do not take function arg evaluation order into
account.
int main()
{
return baz(foo(), bar());
}
x86 is OK, because it's evaluated from right to left, while tilegx & mips etc
are evaluated from left to right.
And I think we should not write a case which depends on specified function arg
evaluation order
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/14877] skip.exp do not take function arg evaluation order into account
2012-11-26 8:39 [Bug testsuite/14877] New: skip.exp do not take function arg evaluation order into account wong.kwongyuan at gmail dot com
@ 2012-11-26 9:18 ` qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-26 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14877
Yao Qi <qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Yao Qi <qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-26 09:18:16 UTC ---
> x86 is OK, because it's evaluated from right to left, while tilegx & mips etc
> are evaluated from left to right.
>
The fail happens on tic6x as well, IIRC.
> And I think we should not write a case which depends on specified function arg
> evaluation order
Yeah, that is true.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-26 9:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-26 8:39 [Bug testsuite/14877] New: skip.exp do not take function arg evaluation order into account wong.kwongyuan at gmail dot com
2012-11-26 9:18 ` [Bug testsuite/14877] " qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).