public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug python/15637] New: override a command from Python
@ 2013-06-17 14:03 tromey at redhat dot com
2013-11-14 19:22 ` [Bug python/15637] " tromey at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 17:58 ` tromey at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-17 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15637
Bug ID: 15637
Summary: override a command from Python
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: python
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: tromey at redhat dot com
Right now if you write a command in Python that has the same name as
an existing command, there is no way to access the previous
command. It would be handy if this were possible.
I have a partial patch for this; I'll upload or push it a
bit later. Now your command's invoke method can use the super
'invoke' to access the previous command.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/15637] override a command from Python
2013-06-17 14:03 [Bug python/15637] New: override a command from Python tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2013-11-14 19:22 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 17:58 ` tromey at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2013-11-14 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15637
--- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> ---
This is on the branch "python/changes-for-gui" in my
gitorious repository: https://gitorious.org/binutils-gdb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/15637] override a command from Python
2013-06-17 14:03 [Bug python/15637] New: override a command from Python tromey at redhat dot com
2013-11-14 19:22 ` [Bug python/15637] " tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2013-11-18 17:58 ` tromey at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2013-11-18 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15637
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> ---
It occurred to me that a single change could fix both
this and bug #13077.
If we had an API to get an existing gdb command as a
Command object, then we could simply invoke methods on it.
Redefining the CLI command would still work fine, since
the new command could simply keep a reference to the old
command.
For this to work nicely I think we'd want to have the
API return both a command and the unparsed part of a command
line (for completion). So:
(command, remainder) = gdb.command('p x * y')
would yield the <print> command and the string "x * y".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-18 17:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-17 14:03 [Bug python/15637] New: override a command from Python tromey at redhat dot com
2013-11-14 19:22 ` [Bug python/15637] " tromey at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 17:58 ` tromey at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).