public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tdep/17285] New: watchpoints: is using ALL_LWPS ok?
@ 2014-08-17 23:19 xdje42 at gmail dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: xdje42 at gmail dot com @ 2014-08-17 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17285
Bug ID: 17285
Summary: watchpoints: is using ALL_LWPS ok?
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tdep
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: xdje42 at gmail dot com
Was looking into what's involved in removing lwp_list and came across this.
Filing so I don't forget it.
x86-linux-nat.c uses iterate_over_lwps to only update debug regs for the
current inferior. Other ports use ALL_LWPS (grep ALL_LWPS *.c) which will
iterate over all threads in all inferiors.
The difference is odd. Is there a bug here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-08-17 23:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-17 23:19 [Bug tdep/17285] New: watchpoints: is using ALL_LWPS ok? xdje42 at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).