[Bug breakpoints/17468] New: syscalls not recorded with arch (or some such)

[Bug breakpoints/17468] New: syscalls not recorded with arch (or some such)

[dje at google dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17468

            Bug ID: 17468
           Summary: syscalls not recorded with arch (or some such)
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: breakpoints
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dje at google dot com

I happened to stumble on this.

On amd64, where there is an "accept" syscall for amd64 but not i386 (at least
not in the xml file)

$ make run
(gdb) catch syscall accept
Unknown syscall name 'accept'.
(gdb) file ~/hello.x64
...
(gdb) catch syscall accept.
Unknown syscall name 'accept'.

Start over and select the executable first.

$ make run
(gdb) file ~/hello.x64
...
(gdb) catch syscall accept
Catchpoint 1 ...

The syscall file name is stored in a global, as a record of whether it has been
loaded, and once set is assumed to be ok for life.
This should be recorded with the arch or some such.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug breakpoints/17468] syscalls not recorded with arch (or some such)

[sergiodj at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17468

Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |sergiodj at redhat dot com
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> ---
There is already a bug for this (I am taking care of it).  I am closing as
duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 10737 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug breakpoints/17468] syscalls not recorded with arch (or some such)

[dje at google dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17468

--- Comment #2 from dje at google dot com ---
(In reply to Sergio Durigan Junior from comment #1)
> There is already a bug for this (I am taking care of it).  I am closing as
> duplicate.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 10737 ***

Thanks.  I had hoped bugzilla would give me the existing CL while I was filing
it (like it tries to do).  Oh well, no worries.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.