public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug symtab/17547] over-eager debuginfo reading
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 22:24:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-17547-4717-sEBJ4hc7yr@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-17547-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17547

--- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #3)
> (In reply to Christian Biesinger from comment #2)
> > backtrace needs debug data for stack unwinding & showing function names (and
> > arguments)
> 
> Certainly, but not for ALL solibs, just those implicated in an actual stack
> frame.

gdb can do some weird stuff for type lookups, so this would need
a bit of careful attention.

Anyway I was wondering recently why gdb isn't using the shared library
memory map to decide which objfiles to search.  That is, surely if
a PC is in some mapped range, then the debuginfo for that function
will come from the corresponding .so.

There's a bunch of loops like:

  for (objfile *objfile : current_program_space->objfiles ())
    {
      struct compunit_symtab *cust
        = objfile->find_pc_sect_compunit_symtab (msymbol, pc, section, 0);
      if (cust)
        return;
    }

... that could then be simplified.  On the branch I'm working on
(see bug #29942), this wouldn't improve downloads of debuginfo,
but would improve parsing wait times.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-01 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-04 15:59 [Bug symtab/17547] New: " tromey at sourceware dot org
2021-05-25 19:15 ` [Bug symtab/17547] " fche at redhat dot com
2021-05-25 19:18 ` cbiesinger at google dot com
2021-05-25 19:19 ` fche at redhat dot com
2021-05-25 19:44 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-05-25 19:50 ` fche at redhat dot com
2021-05-25 20:21 ` keiths at redhat dot com
2021-05-25 21:24 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2021-05-26  1:49 ` rfhn.fhbrrjnzeneqpf at noclue dot notk.org
2023-01-01 22:24 ` tromey at sourceware dot org [this message]
2023-01-03 23:02 ` amerey at redhat dot com
2023-01-04  2:03 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-01-05  1:16 ` amerey at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-17547-4717-sEBJ4hc7yr@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).