[Bug record/23188] Process record does not support instruction 0xc5 (vmovd %esi,%xmm0 / AVX2)

[Bug record/23188] Process record does not support instruction 0xc5 (vmovd %esi,%xmm0 / AVX2)

[code@reto-schneider.ch]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188

Reto Schneider <code@reto-schneider.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |code@reto-schneider.ch

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug record/23188] Process record does not support instruction 0xc5 (vmovd %esi,%xmm0 / AVX2)

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188

--- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Guinevere Larsen
<guinevere@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4b672a4a6d087a12ff24cb5125dbbb5dfa876b9a

commit 4b672a4a6d087a12ff24cb5125dbbb5dfa876b9a
Author: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 29 14:52:59 2024 -0300

    gdb/record: add support to vmovd and vmovq instructions

    This commit adds support to the x86_64 AVX instructions vmovd and vmovq.
    The programmers manuals for Intel and AMD describe these 2 instructions
    as being almost the same, but my local testing, using gcc 13.2 on Fedora
    39, showed several differences and inconsistencies.

    The instruction is supposed to always use the 3-byte VEX prefix, but I
    could only find 2-byte versions. The instructions aren't differentiated
    by the VEX.w bit, but by opcodes and VEX.pp.

    This patch adds a test with many different uses for both vmovd and
    vmovq. It also updates the test gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp to
    reference the generic "missing avx support" bug open in the bug tracker
    (17346), instead of pointing to one that specifically calls out to
    vmovd instructions.

    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188
    Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug record/23188] Process record does not support instruction 0xc5 (vmovd %esi,%xmm0 / AVX2)

[guinevere at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188

Guinevere Larsen <guinevere at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |guinevere at redhat dot com

--- Comment #8 from Guinevere Larsen <guinevere at redhat dot com> ---
Fixed by the commit mentioned by the bot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug record/23188] Process record does not support instruction 0xc5 (vmovd %esi,%xmm0 / AVX2)

[sam at gentoo dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188

Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |16.1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.