public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/23710] gdb is slow and memory hungry consuming debug generated with LTO by GCC
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:06:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-23710-4717-4OeY5Yj7uz@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-23710-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23710

--- Comment #14 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0)
> > gdb takes ~10s to process a LTO bootstrapped cc1 binary and another two
> > seconds
> > when setting the first breakpoint.  It also has allocated 1.6GB memory at
> > that point (compared to ~200MB for a non-LTO binary).
> 
> There's a setting "maint set/show dwarf max-cache-age" which defaults to 5.
> 
> Using a higher setting, I get the following reduction in real execution time:
> - 10    :  1.5%
> - 100   : 12.5%
> - 316   : 16.5%
> - 1000  : 16.5%
> - 10000 : 16.5%
> - 100000: 15.5%
> 
> Note: adding the setting to the gdb command line using -iex to make sure it
> gets set _before_ loading the exec):
> ...
> $ gdb -q -nw -nx -batch -iex "maint set dwarf max-cache-age $n" -ex "b
> do_rpo_vn" cc1
> ...
> 
> Conversely, disabling the cache by setting the value to 0 causes a real
> execution time increase of 46%.

Filed PR25703 - "set dwarf max-cache-age default of 5 is slow for
inter-CU-reference binaries".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-23710-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-08 11:09 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-08 13:14 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2020-03-17  7:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-20  9:06 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-04-02 12:39 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-15  9:43 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de
2020-07-16 12:51 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de
2020-11-24 11:03 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de
2021-03-09 19:08 ` hi-angel at yandex dot ru
2021-04-07  7:25 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de
2021-05-31 12:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-10 18:35 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2021-06-10 22:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-11 15:02 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2021-06-22 13:24 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-17 19:06 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-17 19:12 ` dpmendenhall at gmail dot com
2022-06-18 18:13 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-06-20  6:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-18 13:47 ` fabian@ritter-vogt.de
2023-01-19  2:25 ` sam at gentoo dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-23710-4717-4OeY5Yj7uz@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).