public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/23710] gdb is slow and memory hungry consuming debug generated with LTO by GCC Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:03:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-23710-4717-n32C0t5L4j@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-23710-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23710 --- Comment #17 from rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de --- I did some more tests after GDB 10.1 was released. I am now using GCC 10.2 . GDB 10.1 is faster, but still pauses around 1.5 seconds. My firmware generates an LTO release build .elf file that weighs 10.4 MiB, and GDB uses a lot of RAM: VSZ 620 MiB, RSS 286 MiB. The debug build .elf weighs 8.9 MiB, which is less even though it has more code because of all the asserts. GDB does not pause at all and uses less RAM: VSZ 372 MiB, RSS 38 MiB. I tried setting "maintenance set worker-threads 1", because the default has changed with GDB 10.1, but it did not seem to make much of a difference, so it is probably an unrelated setting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 11:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-23710-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2020-03-08 11:09 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-08 13:14 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com 2020-03-17 7:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-20 9:06 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-02 12:39 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-15 9:43 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de 2020-07-16 12:51 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de 2020-11-24 11:03 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de [this message] 2021-03-09 19:08 ` hi-angel at yandex dot ru 2021-04-07 7:25 ` rdiezmail-binutils at yahoo dot de 2021-05-31 12:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-10 18:35 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2021-06-10 22:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-11 15:02 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2021-06-22 13:24 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-17 19:06 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-17 19:12 ` dpmendenhall at gmail dot com 2022-06-18 18:13 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-06-20 6:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-18 13:47 ` fabian@ritter-vogt.de 2023-01-19 2:25 ` sam at gentoo dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-23710-4717-n32C0t5L4j@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).