public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/23888] ERROR: tcl error sourcing .../gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp. [not found] <bug-23888-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> @ 2022-07-28 9:34 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-28 10:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-04 17:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-28 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23888 Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So, what presumably happens (can't tell because the interesting part of the log, the bit leading to the error is not included) is that: - skip_hw_watchpoint_tests returns 0 meaning hw watchpoints are supported - gdb fails to set a hw watchpoint and instead sets a sw watchpoint That particular situation is handled for arm: ... -re "Watchpoint (\[0-9\]+): .*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { if {[istarget "arm*-*-*"]} { untested $test set wpnum 0 } } ... but not for any other target so wpnum remains "" and we run into the error here: ... if {$wpnum} { ... Possibly this has been fixed for powerpc by commit 8d4e4d13afb ("gdb Power 9 add test for HW watchpoint support."), but not for any other targets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/23888] ERROR: tcl error sourcing .../gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp. [not found] <bug-23888-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2022-07-28 9:34 ` [Bug testsuite/23888] ERROR: tcl error sourcing .../gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-28 10:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-04 17:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-28 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23888 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-July/191121.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/23888] ERROR: tcl error sourcing .../gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp. [not found] <bug-23888-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2022-07-28 9:34 ` [Bug testsuite/23888] ERROR: tcl error sourcing .../gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-28 10:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-08-04 17:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-08-04 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23888 Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |13.1 Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=3c71833c67492ff23bf7f59b25720f06c5a4956f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-04 17:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-23888-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2022-07-28 9:34 ` [Bug testsuite/23888] ERROR: tcl error sourcing .../gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-28 10:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-04 17:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).