public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "fredrik.hederstierna@securitas-direct.com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug remote/25111] [Zephyr/thread aware debugging] remote: write_ptid returns negative tid. Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 08:04:16 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-25111-4717-jw3sC2DiSJ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-25111-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111 Fredrik Hederstierna <fredrik.hederstierna@securitas-direct.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fredrik.hederstierna@securi | |tas-direct.com --- Comment #1 from Fredrik Hederstierna <fredrik.hederstierna@securitas-direct.com> --- When looking into Zephyr and OpenOCD I just saw this ticket. Isn't there a discrepancy in <gdb/remote.c> for ptid_t write/read when it comes to types. The 'lwp' is used as 'tid', but has a wider type: int ptid_get_pid (ptid_t ptid) long ptid_get_lwp (ptid_t ptid) long ptid_get_tid (ptid_t ptid) so in the <read_ptid> it reads into ULONGEST, which I guess is uint64_t, but the <write_tpid> instead implicit cast long to int when using 'lwp as 'tid' (which I believe is often int32_t on a normal host target machine): int tid; tid = ptid.lwp (); Wouldn't it be better to keep the wider long type, and keep calling 'tid' for 'lwp' which it actually is? And also keeping the long-type in the write function? In this case there won't be any overflow if an 32bit int representing 'tid' is becoming >0x80000000. The read function I guess will still handle it as it is using ULONGEST to my understanding. Attaching idea of a possible patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-07 8:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-25111-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2021-11-07 8:04 ` fredrik.hederstierna@securitas-direct.com [this message] 2021-11-07 8:06 ` fredrik.hederstierna@securitas-direct.com 2021-11-07 12:44 ` simark at simark dot ca 2022-01-07 21:11 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-01-07 21:11 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-08-03 17:07 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-08-04 7:32 ` fredrik.hederstierna@securitas-direct.com 2024-02-15 16:59 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-25111-4717-jw3sC2DiSJ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).