public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/27142] New: please add support for babeltrace2
@ 2021-01-03 12:17 doko at debian dot org
  2021-01-04  3:32 ` [Bug build/27142] " simark at simark dot ca
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: doko at debian dot org @ 2021-01-03 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27142

            Bug ID: 27142
           Summary: please add support for babeltrace2
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: build
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: doko at debian dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

please add support to build with babeltrace2

https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libbabeltrace2-dev/filelist

babeltrace2 comes with different include paths and a different pkgconfig file.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/27142] please add support for babeltrace2
  2021-01-03 12:17 [Bug build/27142] New: please add support for babeltrace2 doko at debian dot org
@ 2021-01-04  3:32 ` simark at simark dot ca
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: simark at simark dot ca @ 2021-01-04  3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27142

Simon Marchi <simark at simark dot ca> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |simark at simark dot ca

--- Comment #1 from Simon Marchi <simark at simark dot ca> ---
Technically, I don't think there would be a problem in migrating to Babeltrace
2.  But as much as I'd like to see Babeltrace 2 getting used (I contribute to
it and it's a project essentially driven by my company), we should consider
just removing the CTF (Common Trace Format, no Compact C Type Format) support
in GDB.  GDB tracepoints are already not so widely used, and saving trace data
in CTF is a niche use case within that.

I'll ask on the gdb@ mailing list, see if anyone still cares today.

If you read this and you do care, please say so, so we know it's worth keeping
the feature.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-04  3:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-03 12:17 [Bug build/27142] New: please add support for babeltrace2 doko at debian dot org
2021-01-04  3:32 ` [Bug build/27142] " simark at simark dot ca

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).