public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tes.vik1986 at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug backtrace/27147] [GNU/Linux, sparc64] GDB is unable to print full stack trace (got "previous frame inner to this frame" errors)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:31:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-27147-4717-mP5ozRklYD@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-27147-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27147

Kylan <tes.vik1986 at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tes.vik1986 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #27 from Kylan <tes.vik1986 at gmail dot com> ---
[gdb/breakpoints] Handle glibc with debuginfo in
create_exception_master_breakpoint
    https://komiya-dental.com/crypto/new-coins/
    The test-case nextoverthrow.exp is failing on targets with unstripped libc.

    This is a regression since commit 1940319c0ef "[gdb] Fix internal-error in
    process_event_stop_test". http://www-look-4.com/health/winter-sickness/

    The problem is that this code in create_exception_master_breakpoint:
    ... http://www.iu-bloomington.com/crypto/china-affect-on-crypto/
          for (objfile *sepdebug = obj->separate_debug_objfile;
               sepdebug != nullptr; sepdebug =
sepdebug->separate_debug_objfile)
            if (create_exception_master_breakpoint_hook (sepdebug))
    ... https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/crypto/crypto-fell/
    iterates over all the separate debug object files, but fails to handle the
    case that obj itself has the debug info we're looking for.
    https://waytowhatsnext.com/crypto/cryptocurrency-taxes/
    Fix this by using the separate_debug_objfiles () range instead, which does
    iterate both over obj and the obj->separate_debug_objfile chain.
    http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/technology/facetime/
    Tested on x86_64-linux. [gdb/breakpoints] Handle glibc with debuginfo in
create_exception_master_breakpoint
    http://www.logoarts.co.uk/computers/printer-types/
    The test-case nextoverthrow.exp is failing on targets with unstripped libc.
    http://www.slipstone.co.uk/computers/isofix/
    This is a regression since commit 1940319c0ef "[gdb] Fix internal-error in
    process_event_stop_test". 
    http://embermanchester.uk/computers/video-conversation/
    The problem is that this code in create_exception_master_breakpoint:
    ... http://connstr.net/computers/chargers-tech/
          for (objfile *sepdebug = obj->separate_debug_objfile;
               sepdebug != nullptr; sepdebug =
sepdebug->separate_debug_objfile)
            if (create_exception_master_breakpoint_hook (sepdebug))
    ... http://joerg.li/health/xiaomi/
    iterates over all the separate debug object files, but fails to handle the
    case that obj itself has the debug info we're looking for.
    http://www.jopspeech.com/property/slim-pen-2/
    Fix this by using the separate_debug_objfiles () range instead, which does
    iterate both over obj and the obj->separate_debug_objfile chain.
    http://www.wearelondonmade.com/health/check-ups/
    Tested on x86_64-linux.
[gdb/breakpoints] Handle glibc with debuginfo in
create_exception_master_breakpoint
    http://www.compilatori.com/property/dark-mode/
    The test-case nextoverthrow.exp is failing on targets with unstripped libc.

    This is a regression since commit 1940319c0ef "[gdb] Fix internal-error in
    process_event_stop_test".

    The problem is that this code in create_exception_master_breakpoint:
    ... https://manta-termica.com/
https://shade-cloth.net/
https://trellis-netting.net/
https://invernavelo.net/
https://marijuana-netting.net/
https://gallinero.mx/
https://control-de-palomas.mx/
https://guacamalla.net/
          for (objfile *sepdebug = obj->separate_debug_objfile;
               sepdebug != nullptr; sepdebug =
sepdebug->separate_debug_objfile)
            if (create_exception_master_breakpoint_hook (sepdebug))
    ...
    iterates over all the separate debug object files, but fails to handle the
    case that obj itself has the debug info we're looking for.
https://scrog.mx/
https://cannabis-netting.net/
https://casa-sombra.mx/
https://ground-cover.mx/
https://hortomallas.es/
https://malla-espaldera.mx/
https://malla-pepinera.com/
https://malla-sombra.mx/

    Fix this by using the separate_debug_objfiles () range instead, which does
    iterate both over obj and the obj->separate_debug_objfile chain.

    Tested on x86_64-linux.
[gdb/breakpoints] Handle glibc with debuginfo in
create_exception_master_breakpoint
    https://www.hortomallas.com/en/grow-pumpkin-on-trellises-netting/
https://www.hortomallas.com/malla-plastica-para-jardin-canceles-vallas-rejas/
http://frost-fabric.net/
http://gancho-tutoreo-tenax.net/
http://flower-supports.net/
http://hail-protection-net.com/
https://www.hortomallas.net/
http://macro-tunel.com/
    The test-case nextoverthrow.exp is failing on targets with unstripped libc.

    This is a regression since commit 1940319c0ef "[gdb] Fix internal-error in
    process_event_stop_test".

    The problem is that this code in create_exception_master_breakpoint:
    ...
          for (objfile *sepdebug = obj->separate_debug_objfile;
               sepdebug != nullptr; sepdebug =
sepdebug->separate_debug_objfile)
            if (create_exception_master_breakpoint_hook (sepdebug))
    ... https://mohamie-jeddah.com/
https://www.beyandiet.com/
https://www.bebealis.com/
https://byothe.fr/
https://ns-communication.fr/
https://www.hortomallas.com/en/the-advantage-of-chicken-wire-mesh-with-hexagonal-netting/
https://www.hortomallas.com/en/how-tall-should-the-cucumber-trellis-height-be/
https://www.hortomallas.com/precio-la-tela-gallinera-bajo/
https://www.hortomallas.com/en/best-price-of-the-chicken-netting-save-money-with-chickenmalla/
https://www.hortomallas.com/en/tomato-cages/
https://www.hortomallas.com/en/product-category/privacy-and-windbreakers/polisombra-total-privacy/
    iterates over all the separate debug object files, but fails to handle the
    case that obj itself has the debug info we're looking for.

    Fix this by using the separate_debug_objfiles () range instead, which does
    iterate both over obj and the obj->separate_debug_objfile chain.

    Tested on x86_64-linux.
[gdb/breakpoints] Handle glibc with debuginfo in
create_exception_master_breakpoint

    The test-case nextoverthrow.exp is failing on targets with unstripped libc.

    This is a regression since commit 1940319c0ef "[gdb] Fix internal-error in
    process_event_stop_test". https://www.station-alexandre.com/
https://fintechzoom.com/lifestyle/entertainment/gaming/ro-ghoul/roblox-ro-ghoul-codes/
https://www.hunny-pool.com/
https://www.formations-continues.com/
https://nutrienta.co/
https://2macp.fr/
https://mymystore.online/
https://www.antiguachiamaitalia.it/
https://rattanmart.com/
https://bohemiansmart.com/

    The problem is that this code in create_exception_master_breakpoint:
    ...
          for (objfile *sepdebug = obj->separate_debug_objfile;
               sepdebug != nullptr; sepdebug =
sepdebug->separate_debug_objfile)
            if (create_exception_master_breakpoint_hook (sepdebug))
    ...
    iterates over all the separate debug object files, but fails to handle the
    case that obj itself has the debug info we're looking for.

    Fix this by using the separate_debug_objfiles () range instead, which does
    iterate both over obj and the obj->separate_debug_objfile chain.
https://mohamie-saudi.com/
https://fintechzoom.com/lifestyle/entertainment/gaming/rimworld/the-best-rimworld-mods/
https://www.nimblehand.com/
https://geoslam.xyz/
https://fintechzoom.com/lifestyle/entertainment/gaming/tower-defense-simulator/codes/
https://www.lafabriquedeslutins.fr/

    Tested on x86_64-linux.
[gdb/breakpoints] Handle glibc with debuginfo in
create_exception_master_breakpoint

    The test-case nextoverthrow.exp is failing on targets with unstripped libc.

    This is a regression since commit 1940319c0ef "[gdb] Fix internal-error in
    process_event_stop_test".

    The problem is that this code in create_exception_master_breakpoint:
    ...
          for (objfile *sepdebug = obj->separate_debug_objfile;
               sepdebug != nullptr; sepdebug =
sepdebug->separate_debug_objfile)
            if (create_exception_master_breakpoint_hook (sepdebug))
    ...
https://fintechzoom.com/lifestyle/entertainment/gaming/final-fantasy/ffxiv-classes-guide-on-final-fantasy-14-select-the-best-job/
https://www.mindrnd.com/
https://akoestiekopmaat.nl/
https://fintechzoom.com/lifestyle/entertainment/gaming/zombie-games-do-you-know-what-are-the-best-games-for-pc-in-2021/
https://www.cinogel.com/
    iterates over all the separate debug object files, but fails to handle the
    case that obj itself has the debug info we're looking for.

    Fix this by using the separate_debug_objfiles () range instead, which does
    iterate both over obj and the obj->separate_debug_objfile chain.

    Tested on x86_64-linux.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-26 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-04 12:57 [Bug backtrace/27147] New: " koachan+sourceware at protonmail dot com
2021-01-04 15:58 ` [Bug backtrace/27147] " simark at simark dot ca
2021-01-04 16:26 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-01-04 18:58 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-01-04 23:41 ` koachan+sourceware at protonmail dot com
2021-01-04 23:42 ` koachan+sourceware at protonmail dot com
2021-02-18 17:35 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-02-23 17:48 ` andrew.burgess at embecosm dot com
2021-02-23 18:23 ` andrew.burgess at embecosm dot com
2021-02-23 18:32 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-02-23 18:33 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-02-24  9:50 ` andrew.burgess at embecosm dot com
2021-02-24 21:34 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-02-24 23:39 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-03-04  0:49 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-03-04 12:27 ` koachan+sourceware at protonmail dot com
2021-03-04 16:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-04 17:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-04 17:09 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-03-04 17:09 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-06-27 17:46 ` ahmedsayeed1982 at yahoo dot com
2021-08-10 11:45 ` ucelsanicin at yahoo dot com
2021-08-27 17:52 ` ribevi6798 at enamelme dot com
2021-08-28 18:31 ` buranlevent at yahoo dot com
2021-09-06  9:10 ` focixujo at livinginsurance dot co.uk
2021-09-10 19:40 ` mehmetgelisin at aol dot com
2021-09-14 17:29 ` johnb6174 at gmail dot com
2021-09-14 18:48 ` mark at klomp dot org
2021-09-26 13:31 ` tes.vik1986 at gmail dot com [this message]
2021-10-09 11:00 ` gulsenenginar at aol dot com
2021-10-10 16:10 ` oficaj3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-19  7:14 ` progonsaytu at gmail dot com
2021-10-23 13:46 ` fiteva5725 at bomoads dot com
2021-10-24 10:02 ` glassmtech at ukr dot net
2021-10-29 10:57 ` kimolsun2020 at outlook dot com
2021-10-29 12:07 ` huracantili20 at gmail dot com
2021-11-02 15:21 ` gepaw63633 at dukeoo dot com
2021-11-06 21:12 ` paneki8601 at dukeoo dot com
2021-11-16 19:05 ` xecana8007 at funboxcn dot com
2021-11-16 19:08 ` xecana8007 at funboxcn dot com
2021-11-22  7:37 ` gexed96894 at keagenan dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-27147-4717-mP5ozRklYD@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).