[Bug gdb/27742] New: FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[Bug gdb/27742] New: FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[vries at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

            Bug ID: 27742
           Summary: FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar
                    2/3
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gdb
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

New FAILs:
...
FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2
FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 3
...

First in more detail:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: func1 inlined 2
info locals^M
array = {0 <repeats 64 times>}^M
array = <optimized out>^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2
...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/27742] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[vries at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at sourceware dot org

--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Bisects to:
...
commit 644a2e75ace6b5e76f91d38c28c3b97fcfdeeaa5 (HEAD)
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 15 10:14:11 2021 -0600

    Use common_val_print_checked in print_variable_and_value
...

Before:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: func1 inlined 2
info locals^M
array = {0 <repeats 64 times>}^M
array = {<optimized out> <repeats 64 times>}^M
(gdb) KFAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2 (PRMS:
gdb/25695)
...
and after:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: func1 inlined 2
info locals^M
array = {0 <repeats 64 times>}^M
array = <optimized out>^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2
...

Should the KFAIL pattern be updated?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/27742] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[tromey at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org   |tromey at sourceware dot org

--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Sorry about that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/27742] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[tromey at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I couldn't reproduce this one.

                === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes            22

info locals
array = {0 <repeats 64 times>}


I'm using the x86-64 Fedora 32 system gcc, aka 10.2.
Which compiler are you using?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/27742] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[vries at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #3)
> I couldn't reproduce this one.
> 
> 		=== gdb Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		22
> 
> info locals
> array = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
> 
> 
> I'm using the x86-64 Fedora 32 system gcc, aka 10.2.
> Which compiler are you using?

gcc 7.5.0.  Also reproducible with 8.4.0.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/27742] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[tromey at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

--- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I will try to update the kfail based on the text in the bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/27742] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=392e0bcc0e4088ff6c31ed43a6232e709bf52751

commit 392e0bcc0e4088ff6c31ed43a6232e709bf52751
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 19 07:16:34 2021 -0600

    Fix kfail patterns in inline-locals.exp

    PR gdb/27742 points out that my recent change to
    print_variable_and_value caused a regression in inline-locals.exp.  I
    can't reproduce this, but I came up with this patch based on the
    output shown in the bug.

    gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
    2021-04-19  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>

            PR gdb/27742:
            * gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: Update kfail patterns.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/27742] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2/3

[tromey at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27742

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.1

--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.