public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aburgess at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/28681] Wrong pretty-printed unique_ptr value when using "finish" Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:37:34 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-28681-4717-T8WA36BDiF@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-28681-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28681 Andrew Burgess <aburgess at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aburgess at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Andrew Burgess <aburgess at redhat dot com> --- I see the same result on x86-64. I'm just guessing right now, but I suspect that this is a case of the result being miss-classified as something that can be passed in register, when, it is really something that is passed in memory. The sys-v ABI says that if the return value is a non-trivial, C++ object, the caller should allocate space for the return value, and pass the address of the space to the callee as a hidden first argument. The address of the object should then be returned as the return value. Checking the disassembly of this test, and I can confirm that this is what is happening. However, on return, GDB appears to treat the address of the unique_ptr on the stack as if that was the unique_ptr, so I suspect, that GDB has classified the return value as being passed in register, rather than in memory. The culprit is likely to be amd64_return_value (or something called from that function) for x86-64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 16:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-12-10 17:02 [Bug gdb/28681] New: " simark at simark dot ca 2021-12-12 17:05 ` [Bug gdb/28681] " ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2021-12-13 16:37 ` aburgess at redhat dot com [this message] 2021-12-13 16:50 ` aburgess at redhat dot com 2021-12-13 17:31 ` aburgess at redhat dot com 2021-12-13 18:22 ` simark at simark dot ca 2021-12-14 9:50 ` aburgess at redhat dot com 2021-12-14 13:52 ` simark at simark dot ca 2021-12-15 17:39 ` aburgess at redhat dot com 2021-12-23 12:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-23 12:16 ` aburgess at redhat dot com 2021-12-23 13:05 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca 2022-03-14 10:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-14 21:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-28681-4717-T8WA36BDiF@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).