[Bug build/30003] New: GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b

[Bug build/30003] New: GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b

[phi.debian at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003

            Bug ID: 30003
           Summary: GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: build
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: phi.debian at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Hi All,

GDB build out of the box fail for me since 2ff63a29b0b, doing the build on
ubuntu LTS 22.04, latest compilers (gcc)... (compiler not a factor though).

What seems broken is that since 2ff63a29b0b bfd/ texinfo 'init' component has
removed the from the build, probably because it was empty for so long, yet a
dangling reference to init.texi remains in the file bfd/doc/bfd.texi

bfd/doc/bfd.texi::
...
@include  init.texi
...

I patched this as
@comment phi.debian@gmail.com init was removed at commit 2ff63a29b0b
@comment @include  init.texi


And build run like a champ.

I can't regsiter to the mailing lists, made some subscribe, but got no
feedbacks, so I can't cut a patch.

Cheers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug build/30003] GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b

[tromey at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at sourceware dot org

--- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Upgrade to:

commit 56b3aa508cdbabddd4f46357c8382fe7dca35249
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 10 20:28:18 2023 +1030

    Re: Move bfd_init to bfd.c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug build/30003] GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b

[phi.debian at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003

--- Comment #2 from Phi <phi.debian at gmail dot com> ---

In my latest git pull it looks like the reference

bfd/doc/bfd.texi::
...
@include  init.texi
...


is not there anymore, so may be this is cured, yet I got some more build error,
this time it was failing in gprofng build dir, I got to remove this with 

config --enable-gprofng=no


So may be my previous posting about init.text was an false alarm.


--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug build/30003] GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b

[tromey at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003

--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Just FYI, failures in bfd, gprofng, etc, should be reported to the
binutils product.
gdb is just for gnulib, gdbsupport, gdbserver, gdb, and sim.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug build/30003] GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b

[tromey at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.1

--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Marking as fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug build/30003] GDB build broken since 2ff63a29b0b

[phi.debian at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003

--- Comment #5 from Phi <phi.debian at gmail dot com> ---
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 9:51 PM tromey at sourceware dot org <
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> wrote:

> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30003
>
> --- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
> Just FYI, failures in bfd, gprofng, etc, should be reported to the
> binutils product.
> gdb is just for gnulib, gdbsupport, gdbserver, gdb, and sim.
>

Ha ok good to know.

Cheer,


>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.