public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug mi/30356] New: gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint"
@ 2023-04-14 19:28 epasveer at att dot net
  2023-04-22  0:25 ` [Bug mi/30356] " tromey at sourceware dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: epasveer at att dot net @ 2023-04-14 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356

            Bug ID: 30356
           Summary: gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint"
           Product: gdb
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: mi
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: epasveer at att dot net
  Target Milestone: ---

Hi,

Are there gdb/mi equivalents for the regular checkpoint commands?

* checkpoint
* info checkpoints
* restart <checkpoint-id>
* delete checkpoint <checkpoint-id>

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug mi/30356] gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint"
  2023-04-14 19:28 [Bug mi/30356] New: gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint" epasveer at att dot net
@ 2023-04-22  0:25 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
  2023-05-08 20:18 ` epasveer at att dot net
  2023-05-09 18:12 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-04-22  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at sourceware dot org

--- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I don't think there is currently an MI command for this.
You may be able to write one in Python without too
much effort.  (Perhaps hackily though.)

Checkpoints in general seem a bit weird to me.
It's unclear if people use them much; they are
only available for Linux and they don't work with
threaded inferiors.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug mi/30356] gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint"
  2023-04-14 19:28 [Bug mi/30356] New: gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint" epasveer at att dot net
  2023-04-22  0:25 ` [Bug mi/30356] " tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-05-08 20:18 ` epasveer at att dot net
  2023-05-09 18:12 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: epasveer at att dot net @ 2023-05-08 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356

--- Comment #2 from Ernie Pasveer <epasveer at att dot net> ---
Hi Tom,

Can you elaborate more the the "python hack" approach.  I can at least
investigate that. I suspect it would mean the output from the python code would
follow the form of gdb/mi stream channels. ie:

    -checkpoint-create

    -checkpoint-list
    ^done,CheckpointTable={nr_rows="1",nr_cols="4", ...

    -checkpoint-restore N

The python code would accept these "new" commands and somehow morph them into
the native gdb commands.

https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Checkpoint_002fRestart.html#Checkpoint_002fRestart


Perhaps you can point me to the resources to make custom commands in python.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug mi/30356] gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint"
  2023-04-14 19:28 [Bug mi/30356] New: gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint" epasveer at att dot net
  2023-04-22  0:25 ` [Bug mi/30356] " tromey at sourceware dot org
  2023-05-08 20:18 ` epasveer at att dot net
@ 2023-05-09 18:12 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-05-09 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356

--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Basically you can write new MI commands in Python now:

https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/GDB_002fMI-Commands-In-Python.html#GDB_002fMI-Commands-In-Python

So you could use this to wrap the CLI commands and generate MI output.
This isn't fantastic but it could be done without patching gdb itself.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-09 18:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-14 19:28 [Bug mi/30356] New: gdb/mi equivalent for "checkpoint" epasveer at att dot net
2023-04-22  0:25 ` [Bug mi/30356] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-05-08 20:18 ` epasveer at att dot net
2023-05-09 18:12 ` tromey at sourceware dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).