public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug server/30453] gdbserver cannot set breakpoints when  /proc/pid/mem is not writable
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:06:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-30453-4717-Lu8hBPztee@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30453-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30453

Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com

--- Comment #8 from Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com> ---
Hello, sorry for necro-bumping this, but I'm working on Chromebooks on behalf
of Collabora and encountered this problem - of not having a functional remote
debugger past GDB 9.2 (yes CrOS based systems are still using v9.2...).

I got GDB working again by creating a kernel patch as you suggested above, to
relax the /proc/pid/mem hardening restriction for ptrace-scoped processes, but
it got rejected by ChromiumOS upstream as too risky.

Please see the attached kernel patch and this reply [1] if you want more
details on that.

I also wrote a patch for gdbserver which adds back the the ptrace r/w as a
fallback which works nicely for my test cases. I've attached the patch and
tried to explain as best I can in the commit message.

Please consider the perspective of ChromeOS/ChromiumOS users, for which users
GDB has a regression because basic functionality used to work and is broken in
more recent releases.

Would the gdbserver patch be acceptable to fix this case? I can modify it if
necessary to make it acceptable, for example after writing it I noticed that
gdb/linux-nat.c contains proc_mem_file_is_writable () which does something
similar, maybe I could reuse that logic?

Thanks,
Adrian 

[1] https://issuetracker.corp.google.com/issues/268356054#comment61

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-16 16:00 [Bug server/30453] New: " manojgupta at google dot com
2023-05-16 16:02 ` [Bug server/30453] " manojgupta at google dot com
2023-05-16 18:17 ` pedro at palves dot net
2023-05-16 18:24 ` manojgupta at google dot com
2023-05-16 20:00 ` pedro at palves dot net
2023-05-16 20:13 ` manojgupta at google dot com
2023-05-17 19:03 ` manojgupta at google dot com
2023-05-18 11:50 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-15 19:06 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com [this message]
2024-02-15 19:07 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-15 19:07 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-15 19:13 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-15 20:09 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-15 20:18 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-15 20:18 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-16  2:54 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-02-16  5:29 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-16  5:40 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-16  9:47 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-16 17:33 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-02-16 17:53 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-16 17:56 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-16 18:10 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-16 18:17 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-16 20:53 ` mark at klomp dot org
2024-02-16 21:36 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-16 21:38 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-02-16 21:57 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-02-22 13:28 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com
2024-02-23 17:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-30453-4717-Lu8hBPztee@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).