public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manojgupta at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug server/30453] gdbserver cannot set breakpoints when /proc/pid/mem is not writable Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 18:24:56 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30453-4717-X64lzrpB6b@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-30453-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30453 --- Comment #3 from Manoj Gupta <manojgupta at google dot com> --- Unfortunately, writes to /proc/pid/mem has been disabled for a long time as part of security hardening as it has been used in security expolits. Please feel free to check the bugs https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=766253 and https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=781376 . Ptrace is also discussed in that bug. It is lesser of an issue because the devices use seccomp filters for most critical and do not allow ptrace syscall to be used. ``` sure, if you have ptrace scope on a process, it def leaves it open to arbitrary read/writes of any memory region. the difference there is that it requires you to be within a specific scope (as you noted), and you need to be able to access the ptrace syscall. that's a much higher barrier than accessing the "mem" file which can be hit with a simple `dd` fork+exec. when it comes to seccomp filters, we have the ability to run daemons/processes through restrictive syscall filters, and we have yet to include ptrace there. off the top of my head, the only valid use of ptrace on the system is in upstart itself (which uses it for process tracking). it might be interesting to severely restrict ptrace so only pid 1 (init) is allowed to use it. ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-16 18:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-05-16 16:00 [Bug server/30453] New: " manojgupta at google dot com 2023-05-16 16:02 ` [Bug server/30453] " manojgupta at google dot com 2023-05-16 18:17 ` pedro at palves dot net 2023-05-16 18:24 ` manojgupta at google dot com [this message] 2023-05-16 20:00 ` pedro at palves dot net 2023-05-16 20:13 ` manojgupta at google dot com 2023-05-17 19:03 ` manojgupta at google dot com 2023-05-18 11:50 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-15 19:06 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-15 19:07 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-15 19:07 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-15 19:13 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-15 20:09 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-15 20:18 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-15 20:18 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-16 2:54 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-02-16 5:29 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-16 5:40 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-16 9:47 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-16 17:33 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-02-16 17:53 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-16 17:56 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-16 18:10 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-16 18:17 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-16 20:53 ` mark at klomp dot org 2024-02-16 21:36 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-16 21:38 ` pedro at palves dot net 2024-02-16 21:57 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-02-22 13:28 ` adrian.ratiu at collabora dot com 2024-02-23 17:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30453-4717-X64lzrpB6b@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).