public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug backtrace/30614] New: Consider allowing to provide alternative stack for backtraces
@ 2023-07-04 8:56 plasmahh at gmx dot net
2023-07-04 15:36 ` [Bug backtrace/30614] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-07-05 14:48 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: plasmahh at gmx dot net @ 2023-07-04 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30614
Bug ID: 30614
Summary: Consider allowing to provide alternative stack for
backtraces
Product: gdb
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: backtrace
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: plasmahh at gmx dot net
Target Milestone: ---
gdb allows to view a single frame living on an alternative stack
> help frame view
View a stack frame that might be outside the current backtrace.
Usage: frame view STACK-ADDRESS
frame view STACK-ADDRESS PC-ADDRESS
Especially in (embedded) environments where gdb is not aware of e.g. user
threads it would be helpful if the backtrace command could accept the same
optional parameters to start unwinding at that alternative stack.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug backtrace/30614] Consider allowing to provide alternative stack for backtraces
2023-07-04 8:56 [Bug backtrace/30614] New: Consider allowing to provide alternative stack for backtraces plasmahh at gmx dot net
@ 2023-07-04 15:36 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-07-05 14:48 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-07-04 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30614
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org
--- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
See this thread as well:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb/YiCk+NNtAGQPhyK5@stefanha-x1.localdomain/
gdb could be taught about user ("green") threads, I had some
experimental patches for this, also mentioned in that thread.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug backtrace/30614] Consider allowing to provide alternative stack for backtraces
2023-07-04 8:56 [Bug backtrace/30614] New: Consider allowing to provide alternative stack for backtraces plasmahh at gmx dot net
2023-07-04 15:36 ` [Bug backtrace/30614] " tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-07-05 14:48 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2023-07-05 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30614
Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ssbssa at sourceware dot org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-05 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-04 8:56 [Bug backtrace/30614] New: Consider allowing to provide alternative stack for backtraces plasmahh at gmx dot net
2023-07-04 15:36 ` [Bug backtrace/30614] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-07-05 14:48 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).