public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug mi/31090] New: "mi" equivalent of "(gdb) kill" @ 2023-11-28 0:03 epasveer at att dot net 2023-11-28 1:19 ` [Bug mi/31090] " tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-11-28 15:27 ` epasveer at att dot net 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: epasveer at att dot net @ 2023-11-28 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090 Bug ID: 31090 Summary: "mi" equivalent of "(gdb) kill" Product: gdb Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mi Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: epasveer at att dot net Target Milestone: --- Is there an equivalent to the "kill" command? Something like? -exec-kill I'd like to kill the running program, reap the child process, but leave the executable's symbol information still loaded in gdb. The "kill" command seems to do all this but I can't see a "mi" equivalent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug mi/31090] "mi" equivalent of "(gdb) kill" 2023-11-28 0:03 [Bug mi/31090] New: "mi" equivalent of "(gdb) kill" epasveer at att dot net @ 2023-11-28 1:19 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-11-28 15:27 ` epasveer at att dot net 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-11-28 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090 Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org --- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> --- I don't think there is one. One could be added (though for best results you'd have to do it). Using the CLI "kill" command seems fine, though, as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug mi/31090] "mi" equivalent of "(gdb) kill" 2023-11-28 0:03 [Bug mi/31090] New: "mi" equivalent of "(gdb) kill" epasveer at att dot net 2023-11-28 1:19 ` [Bug mi/31090] " tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-11-28 15:27 ` epasveer at att dot net 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: epasveer at att dot net @ 2023-11-28 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090 --- Comment #2 from Ernie Pasveer <epasveer at att dot net> --- Yes, the CLI "kill" command does work. However, it's not "mi" friendly for frontend use. eg: there's no "^done" message afterwards. I'll attempt to implement it and submit a patch, as per the documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-28 15:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-11-28 0:03 [Bug mi/31090] New: "mi" equivalent of "(gdb) kill" epasveer at att dot net 2023-11-28 1:19 ` [Bug mi/31090] " tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-11-28 15:27 ` epasveer at att dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).