public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug python/31391] Incorrect FinishBreakpoint test
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:22:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31391-4717-gYMSdtl6YX@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31391-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31391

--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #0)
> > py-finishbreakpoint.exp does this:
> > 
> >     gdb_test "python print (finishbp_default.hit_count)" "1.*" "check
> > finishBP on default frame has been hit"
> > 
> > It is trying to check the hit count of this breakpoint.
> > However, the actual output is:
> > 
> > python print (finishbp_default.hit_count)
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
> > RuntimeError: Breakpoint 3 is invalid.
> > Error while executing Python code.
> > 
> > 
> > ... which matches by mistake.
> > This came up in a patch series I'm working on.
> > 
> > I plan to kfail this but not close this bug; I think
> > this probably is a real problem of some sort.
> 
> I think this may be the behaviour specified here (
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Breakpoints-In-Python.
> html ):
> ...
> The optional temporary argument makes the breakpoint a temporary breakpoint.
> Temporary breakpoints are deleted after they have been hit. Any further
> access to the Python breakpoint after it has been hit will result in a
> runtime error (as that breakpoint has now been automatically deleted).
> ...
> 
> So AFAIU, this happens:
> - finish breakpoints 3 and 4 are set at the same location
> - a continue hits both finish breakpoints
> - the hit_count is not available in either breakpoint, as per the doc,
> because
>   both temporary breakpoints have been deleted.
> - the return_value is available in both finish breakpoints, because it
> doesn't
>   rely on accessing the underlying python breakpoint
> 
> I think the test-case can be updated to accept the current behaviour, or we
> can even remove the hit_count test.

I'll write a patch to this effect.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-16 15:41 [Bug python/31391] New: " tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-02-18 10:23 ` [Bug python/31391] " ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-02-26 16:05 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27  8:22 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-02-27  9:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27  9:14 ` [Bug testsuite/31391] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 15:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 15:19 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-31391-4717-gYMSdtl6YX@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).