public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug python/31467] New: gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" @ 2024-03-09 2:51 mitch at runsafesecurity dot com 2024-03-09 2:52 ` [Bug python/31467] " mitch at runsafesecurity dot com ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: mitch at runsafesecurity dot com @ 2024-03-09 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31467 Bug ID: 31467 Summary: gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" Product: gdb Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: python Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: mitch at runsafesecurity dot com Target Milestone: --- Using `gdb.with_parameter` method with `breakpoint pending` fails and does not restore original parameter value when original parameter is "auto". ```python # foo.py gdb.execute("show breakpoint pending") print ("Old: ", gdb.parameter("breakpoint pending")) with gdb.with_parameter("breakpoint pending", "on"): gdb.execute("show breakpoint pending") print ("New: ", gdb.parameter("breakpoint pending")) ``` ``` (gdb) source foo.py source foo.py Debugger's behavior regarding pending breakpoints is auto. Old: None Debugger's behavior regarding pending breakpoints is on. New: True Traceback (most recent call last): File "foo.py", line 16, in <module> print ("New: ", gdb.parameter("breakpoint pending")) File "/usr/lib/python3.7/contextlib.py", line 119, in __exit__ next(self.gen) File "/usr/local/share/gdb/python/gdb/__init__.py", line 263, in with_parameter set_parameter(name, old_value) File "/usr/local/share/gdb/python/gdb/__init__.py", line 250, in set_parameter execute("set " + name + " " + str(value), to_string=True) gdb.error: "on", "off" or "auto" expected. (gdb) source foo.py source foo.py Debugger's behavior regarding pending breakpoints is on. Old: True Debugger's behavior regarding pending breakpoints is on. New: True (gdb) ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/31467] gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" 2024-03-09 2:51 [Bug python/31467] New: gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" mitch at runsafesecurity dot com @ 2024-03-09 2:52 ` mitch at runsafesecurity dot com 2024-03-09 13:05 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: mitch at runsafesecurity dot com @ 2024-03-09 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31467 Mitch Souders <mitch at runsafesecurity dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unknown |14.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/31467] gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" 2024-03-09 2:51 [Bug python/31467] New: gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" mitch at runsafesecurity dot com 2024-03-09 2:52 ` [Bug python/31467] " mitch at runsafesecurity dot com @ 2024-03-09 13:05 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2024-03-11 15:37 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-03-12 14:07 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2024-03-09 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31467 Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-09 CC| |ssbssa at sourceware dot org --- Comment #1 from Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> --- gdb.parameter() returns for auto_boolean types 'None' if it's set to 'auto', but gdb.set_parameter() thinks 'None' can only mean 'unlimited'. Not sure how to fix this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/31467] gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" 2024-03-09 2:51 [Bug python/31467] New: gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" mitch at runsafesecurity dot com 2024-03-09 2:52 ` [Bug python/31467] " mitch at runsafesecurity dot com 2024-03-09 13:05 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2024-03-11 15:37 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-03-12 14:07 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2024-03-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31467 Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org --- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> --- Vaguely related to bug#12188, where another case returns something unexpected for auto. Maybe the only fix is some API for looking up the underlying "type" of a parameter so set_parameter can figure out this is "auto boolean". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/31467] gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" 2024-03-09 2:51 [Bug python/31467] New: gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" mitch at runsafesecurity dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2024-03-11 15:37 ` tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2024-03-12 14:07 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2024-03-12 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31467 --- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> --- Alternatively, for this particular case, a fix to bug#12816 would seem to work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-12 14:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-03-09 2:51 [Bug python/31467] New: gdb python api with_parameter doesn't work correctly for "breakpoint pending" mitch at runsafesecurity dot com 2024-03-09 2:52 ` [Bug python/31467] " mitch at runsafesecurity dot com 2024-03-09 13:05 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2024-03-11 15:37 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-03-12 14:07 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).