* gdb/1180: gcc bug or gdb bug?
@ 2003-04-19 15:48 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-04-23 2:16 ` Elena Zannoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-04-19 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Hi guys,
Can I get someone to look at gdb/1180 and say whether it's a
gcc bug or a gdb bug?
gcc changed its debugging output and gdb doesn't like the new output.
I need to decide whether to file a PR against gcc about it.
Michael C
Whiney QA guy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb/1180: gcc bug or gdb bug?
2003-04-19 15:48 gdb/1180: gcc bug or gdb bug? Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2003-04-23 2:16 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-04-23 3:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Elena Zannoni @ 2003-04-23 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: gdb
Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can I get someone to look at gdb/1180 and say whether it's a
> gcc bug or a gdb bug?
>
> gcc changed its debugging output and gdb doesn't like the new output.
> I need to decide whether to file a PR against gcc about it.
>
> Michael C
> Whiney QA guy
This seems like a gcc debuginfo problem to me. There is a lexical
block for the innermost block but not for the middle one.
elena
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb/1180: gcc bug or gdb bug?
2003-04-23 2:16 ` Elena Zannoni
@ 2003-04-23 3:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-04-23 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Elena Zannoni; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, gdb
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:21:32PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Can I get someone to look at gdb/1180 and say whether it's a
> > gcc bug or a gdb bug?
> >
> > gcc changed its debugging output and gdb doesn't like the new output.
> > I need to decide whether to file a PR against gcc about it.
> >
> > Michael C
> > Whiney QA guy
>
>
> This seems like a gcc debuginfo problem to me. There is a lexical
> block for the innermost block but not for the middle one.
Looks like that to me too. Michael, I believe this was caused by one
of Zack's patches; I told him about it last week and he hasn't had time
to look at it. I recommend filing a GCC PR, and including the
changelog entry for the responsible patch - since you've already got it
narrowed down quite precisely!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-23 3:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-19 15:48 gdb/1180: gcc bug or gdb bug? Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-04-23 2:16 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-04-23 3:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).