* why some functions compiled with debug info and some are not ?
@ 2003-06-13 8:59 #-sadiq shaikh-#
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: #-sadiq shaikh-# @ 2003-06-13 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Hi all,
I'm not sure why my programme has partial debug info.
I have one programme in the same single file.simple prog
with main calling some functions lets say x y and z.
I'm able to set breakpoint at main but when i do step
command its don't step in, reason is main has no line nos,
but its not same with other functions.can anybody tell
me why main has no line nos/debug info ?
Although i'm not using any optimisation and tried -gl flag
also no result.
Another issue is next command is behaving same as step command.
can anybody tell me why ?
My target:
uclinux, MIPS
Regards,
sadiq.shaikh
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-06-13 8:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-13 8:59 why some functions compiled with debug info and some are not ? #-sadiq shaikh-#
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).